Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2017 67 • KG SZ BEK 2017 67 Generato dall'IA

Prosecutor's Seizure of Substitute Income Limited to Subsistence Needs

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 67
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant, facing criminal proceedings, appealed a decision by the cantonal prosecutor's office to seize substitute income up to the subsistence level, arguing that the seizure order was too broad and violated their right to livelihood. The court reasoned that while the prosecutor has the right to secure potential fines and costs through seizure, the seizure must be proportionate and respect the essential needs of the accused; therefore, the court partially granted the appeal, limiting the seizure to the amount exceeding the documented subsistence needs of the defendant.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Prosecutor's Seizure of Substitute Income Limited to Subsistence Needs: The court reasoned that while the prosecutor has the right to secure potential fines and costs through seizure, the seizure must be proportionate and respect the essential needs of the accused; therefore, the court partially granted the appeal, limiting the seizure to the amount exceeding the documented subsistence needs of the defendant.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ordine del pignoramento sequestro di documenti confisca dei proventi di reato reddito sufficiente capacità civile limitata diritto a condizioni minime d'esistenza
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 130
Prosecutor's Asset Seizure Upheld Despite Investigation Delay and Economic Hardship
BEK 2019 79
Appeal Regarding Prosecutor's Inaction on Fund Release vs. Seizure Order Validity
BEK 2017 104
Appeal Against Cost Allocation Following Discontinued Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2016 177
Termination of Proceedings, Allocation of Costs, and Compensation for Detention
BEK 2021 157
Prosecutor's Seizure Order Upheld on Proportionality Grounds

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 29. August 2017 \n BEK 2017 67 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Beschuldigte und Beschwerdeführerin, \n amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Beschlagnahme von Ersatzeinkommen bis zum Notbedarf |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 31. März 2017, SUB 2016 568);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: