Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2017 50 • KG SZ BEK 2017 50 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Provisional Enforcement of Debt Acknowledgment

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 50
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party sought to overturn a lower court's decision regarding the granting of definitive legal authorization for debt collection proceedings, but the higher court dismissed the appeal because the underlying claim, which was based on a document acknowledging a debt obligation, sufficiently satisfied the formal requirements for provisional enforcement, thereby justifying the lower court's ruling to maintain the legal authorization against the appellant's objection.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Provisional Enforcement of Debt Acknowledgment: A party sought to overturn a lower court's decision regarding the granting of definitive legal authorization for debt collection proceedings, but the higher court dismissed the appeal because the underlying claim, which was based on a document acknowledging a debt obligation, sufficiently satisfied the formal requirements for provisional enforcement, thereby justifying the lower court's ruling to maintain the legal authorization against the appellant's objection.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
riconoscimento di debito opposizione al precetto esecutivo procedura esecutiva requisiti di forma annullamento della dichiarazione di fallimento pagamento provvisorio definitive Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung definitive
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 5. Mai 2017 \n BEK 2017 50 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung (Betreibung Nr. xxx) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 20. Februar 2017, ZES 2016 619);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: