Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2017 40 • KG SZ BEK 2017 40 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Debt Enforcement Proceedings Based on Recognized Instrument

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 40
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant contested a lower court's order granting definitive debt enforcement proceedings based on a recognized debt instrument. The court, reviewing the appeal against the lower court's decision regarding definitive debt legalization, considered the submitted documents and the established facts of the case, ultimately deciding on the validity of the enforcement claim and affirming or overturning the initial ruling based on the substantive legal grounds presented.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Debt Enforcement Proceedings Based on Recognized Instrument: The court, reviewing the appeal against the lower court's decision regarding definitive debt legalization, considered the submitted documents and the established facts of the case, ultimately deciding on the validity of the enforcement claim and affirming or overturning the initial ruling based on the substantive legal grounds presented.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
validità dell'esecuzione autorizzazione all’esecuzione titolo all'ordine esecuzione di atti autentici recupero di crediti azione di accertamento definitive Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung definitive
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 75
Appeal Regarding Definitive Debt Recognition Proceedings
BEK 2018 81
Debt Enforcement Recognition Appeal Dismissal
BEK 2020 108
Execution of Debt Instrument Appeal
BEK 2024 91
Debt Enforcement Recognition Appeal Affirmation
BEK 2023 31
Appeal of Definitive Summary Judgment Based on Debt Instrument Validity

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 26. April 2017 \n BEK 2017 40 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Florian Farner. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 16. Januar 2017, ZES 2016 633);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: