Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2017 34 • KG SZ BEK 2017 34 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Definitive Enforcement Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 34
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved appeals against decisions from a single district court judge regarding definitive enforcement proceedings (Rechtsöffnung). The appellant contested the lower court's refusal to grant definitive enforcement, a remedy sought to allow execution based on an enforceable title. The appellate court reviewed the underlying facts and the lower court's application of procedural law governing definitive enforcement proceedings, ultimately deciding on the validity of the contested rulings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Definitive Enforcement Proceedings: The appellant contested the lower court's refusal to grant definitive enforcement, a remedy sought to allow execution based on an enforceable title. The appellate court reviewed the underlying facts and the lower court's application of procedural law governing definitive enforcement proceedings, ultimately deciding on the validity of the contested rulings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura esecutiva controllo della procedura sentenze interpretative limitazione del potere cognitivo impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio procedimento pregiudiziale definitive Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung definitive
Generato dall'IA
ZK2 2025 2
Appeal of Enforcement Proceedings Order
BEK 2021 160
Appeal Against Enforcement Proceedings Decision
ZK2 2025 7
Appeal Regarding Judgment Enforcement
BEK 2022 179
Appeal Regarding Definitive Summary Judgment for Enforcement of Written Claim
ZK2 2022 12
Appeal Against Enforcement Order Validity

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 19. Juni 2017 \n BEK 2017 34/35/37 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr. |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n In Sachen |\n A.________ \n Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerden gegen die Verfügungen des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 23. Januar 2017, ZES 2016 642, ZES 2016 643, ZES 2016 645);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: