Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2017 190 • KG SZ BEK 2017 190 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Sustained: Uncertified Debt Acknowledgment Insufficient for Provisional Legal Authorization

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 190
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company filing an appeal challenged a lower court's decision regarding provisional legal authorization for a debt collection matter, where the original decision granted the authorization based on a submitted document. The appellate court sustained the appeal, reasoning that the document presented by the opposing party was merely an uncertified copy of an acknowledgment of debt, which, under established procedure, is insufficient to support an application for provisional legal authorization, necessitating the dismissal of the underlying request.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Sustained: Uncertified Debt Acknowledgment Insufficient for Provisional Legal Authorization: The appellate court sustained the appeal, reasoning that the document presented by the opposing party was merely an uncertified copy of an acknowledgment of debt, which, under established procedure, is insufficient to support an application for provisional legal authorization, necessitating the dismissal of the underlying request.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
riconoscimento di debito opposizione al precetto esecutivo proroga tardiva del termine domanda confermativa di accesso comminatoria di fallimento lettera di credito standby provisorische Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung provisorische
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 7. Februar 2018 \n BEK 2017 190 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ GmbH, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen B.________ GmbH, Gesuchsgegnerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n provisorische Rechtsöffnung (Betr. Nr. xx) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 27. November 2017, ZES 2017 430);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: