Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2017 181 • KG SZ BEK 2017 181 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed: Non-Appealable Interlocutory Decision on Cost Advancement

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 181
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company appealed a ruling requiring it to advance costs for a payment order initiated by a debt collection office. The court found that the lower court's decision, which was technically a ruling rather than a formal judgment, constituted a non-appealable interlocutory decision regarding procedural matters related to the advancement of costs, thus upholding the objection to the appeal and dismissing the matter without ruling on the merits of the cost advance requirement itself.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed: Non-Appealable Interlocutory Decision on Cost Advancement: The court found that the lower court's decision, which was technically a ruling rather than a formal judgment, constituted a non-appealable interlocutory decision regarding procedural matters related to the advancement of costs, thus upholding the objection to the appeal and dismissing the matter without ruling on the merits of the cost advance requirement itself.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decisione incidentale impugnabile anticipo delle spese censure procedurali anticipo incasso riesame di una decisione precedente Kostenvorschuss für Zahlungsbefehl | SchKG-Beschwerde
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 62
Company Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Substantive Reasoning Regarding Payment Order Costs
ZK2 2020 84
Appeal Regarding Advance Cost Payment Order
ZK2 2020 78
Appealability of Interlocutory Decision on Motion to Dismiss Venue
BEK 2020 48
Appealability of Interlocutory Order on Official Defense Costs
BEK 2019 40
Appeal Against Intermediate Debt Enforcement Ruling Dismissed

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 22. Dezember 2017 \n BEK 2017 181 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ AG, Beschwerdeführerin, gegen Betreibungskreis Altendorf Lachen, Postfach 43, Seeplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Kostenvorschuss für Zahlungsbefehl |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen den Entscheid (recte: Verfügung) des Bezirksgerichtspräsidenten March vom 15. November 2017, APD 2017 24);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident \n als Präsident der oberen kantonalen Aufsichtsbehörde in Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (Beschwerdekammer), \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: