Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2017 170 • KG SZ BEK 2017 170 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Imposition of Procedural Costs After Investigation Discontinuation Due to Insufficient Evidence

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 170
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a prosecutor's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings, arguing that the costs imposed upon them following the discontinuation were unjustified. The court upheld the appeal, finding that the grounds for discontinuing the investigation—specifically, that the evidence was insufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt—meant the imposition of procedural costs on the accused was inappropriate because the discontinuation was not based on a lack of prosecution interest or a procedural defect attributable to the accused, but rather on the inherent lack of conclusive evidence.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 432 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 433 StPO, Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Appeal Regarding Imposition of Procedural Costs After Investigation Discontinuation Due to Insufficient Evidence: The court upheld the appeal, finding that the grounds for discontinuing the investigation—specifically, that the evidence was insufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt—meant the imposition of procedural costs on the accused was inappropriate because the discontinuation was not based on a lack of prosecution interest or a procedural defect attributable to the accused, but rather on the inherent lack of conclusive evidence.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
abbandono del procedimento penale spese per le indagini dubbio ragionevole vizio di procedura perdita dell'interesse degno di protezione principio di opportunità Einstellung Strafverfahren, Kostenauflage | Kosten- und Entschädigungsfolgen

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
The appeal was partially accepted, which implies a decision based on this provision concerning the costs of the first instance procedure.
Art. 432 Abs. 1 StPO
The court ordered the partial reversal of the decision regarding the costs of the first instance procedure.
Art. 433 StPO
The court decided on the costs of the appeal procedure.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
This provision was cited for the allocation of court fees for the appeal procedure.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2016 191
Appeal Regarding Allocation of Procedural Costs After Investigation Discontinuation
GPR 2017 20
Appeal Against Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings Cost Allocation
BEK 2017 104
Appeal Against Cost Allocation Following Discontinued Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2019 211
Prosecutor Discontinuance of Proceedings and Procedural Costs Imposition on Accused
GPR 2018 2
Prosecutor's Discontinuation of Proceedings and Costs Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The appeal was partially accepted, which implies a decision based on this provision concerning the costs of the first instance procedure.

Art. 432 Abs. 1 StPO

The court ordered the partial reversal of the decision regarding the costs of the first instance procedure.

Art. 433 StPO

The court decided on the costs of the appeal procedure.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

This provision was cited for the allocation of court fees for the appeal procedure.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 15. Februar 2018 \n BEK 2017 170 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Alessandro Glogg. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren, Kostenauflage |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Einstellungsverfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz vom 12. Oktober 2017, SUI 2015 6731);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: