Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2017 169 • KG SZ BEK 2017 169 Generato dall'IA

Review of Property Seizure Order in Criminal Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 169
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual filed a complaint against an order for the seizure of property issued by the public prosecutor's office. The court, in reviewing the seizure order concerning the alleged criminal proceedings, concluded that the required prerequisites for the seizure under the relevant procedural law were met, specifically noting that the seized items were relevant to the investigation and that the seizure was necessary to secure evidence or prevent further criminal acts, thereby upholding the prosecutor's decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Review of Property Seizure Order in Criminal Proceedings: The court, in reviewing the seizure order concerning the alleged criminal proceedings, concluded that the required prerequisites for the seizure under the relevant procedural law were met, specifically noting that the seized items were relevant to the investigation and that the seizure was necessary to secure evidence or prevent further criminal acts, thereby upholding the prosecutor's decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sequestro di mezzi di prova denuncia penale decisioni incidentali accertamenti complementari proprietà pubblica azione di rivendicazione Beschlagnahme | Zwangsmassnahmen/Beschlagnahme
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2023 52
Appeal of Property Seizure Order
BEK 2020 81
Appeal Against Seizure Order in Financial Investigation
BEK 2024 206
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Seizure Order
BEK 2020 199
Appeal Against Order for Release of Seized Property
BEK 2017 75
Challenge to Search and Seizure Order Legality

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 20. November 2017 \n BEK 2017 169 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Beschlagnahme |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen den Beschlagnahmebefehl der Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz vom 11. Oktober 2017, SUI 2017 3372);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: