Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2017 145 • KG SZ BEK 2017 145 Generato dall'IA

Prosecutor's Decision to Dismiss Abuse of Office Complaint Upheld

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 145
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private party appealed a prosecutor's decision to dismiss a complaint concerning alleged abuse of office, arguing the initial investigation was insufficient. The court considered the prosecutor's decision not to pursue charges after an initial inquiry, determining that the prosecutor acted appropriately by concluding that the allegations did not meet the threshold required to establish official misconduct under the relevant law, thereby upholding the decision to discontinue the proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Prosecutor's Decision to Dismiss Abuse of Office Complaint Upheld: The court considered the prosecutor's decision not to pursue charges after an initial inquiry, determining that the prosecutor acted appropriately by concluding that the allegations did not meet the threshold required to establish official misconduct under the relevant law, thereby upholding the decision to discontinue the proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
accuse di abuso ricusazione del pubblico ministero ritiro della querela penale licenziamento amministrativo procedura disciplinare degli avvocati rispetto della dignità delle funzioni
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 121
Complainant v. Prosecutor (Abuse of Office Investigation Dismissal)
BEK 2018 19
Review of Prosecutor's Decision to Dismiss Misconduct Investigation
BEK 2018 12
Private Plaintiffs v. Prosecutor's Decision Not to Prosecute Abuse of Office Allegations
BEK 2021 101
Prosecutor's Dismissal of Official Misconduct Complaint Against Police Officer Overturned
BEK 2019 10
Private Complainant v. Public Prosecutor (Abuse of Office Proceedings)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 10. Oktober 2017 \n BEK 2017 145 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, 2. C.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 21. August 2017, SUB 2017 486);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: