Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2017 126 • KG SZ BEK 2017 126 Generato dall'IA

Revision Denied for Traffic Violation Wake Infraction

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 126
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual sought a revision of a penal order issued by the public prosecutor's office, stemming from an infraction where the accused failed to observe the traffic signal prohibiting the creation of harmful wake or suction, an act categorized under traffic violations. The court, considering the application for revision, ultimately denied the request because the grounds presented by the accused did not meet the statutory requirements for admitting a revision application under the applicable procedural law, which typically requires the discovery of new, decisive facts or a material error in the prior ruling's assessment of the facts or law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Revision Denied for Traffic Violation Wake Infraction: The court, considering the application for revision, ultimately denied the request because the grounds presented by the accused did not meet the statutory requirements for admitting a revision application under the applicable procedural law, which typically requires the discovery of new, decisive facts or a material error in the prior ruling's assessment of the facts or law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
infrazione alle norme della circolazione domanda di revisione presupposti legali presupposto processuale ragione di polizia procedura di revisione penale
Generato dall'IA
STK 2019 65
Revision Dismissed for Failure to Comply with Procedural Order
BEK 2023 24
Dismissal of Revision Application for Speeding Fine Due to Procedural Defects
BEK 2020 131
Defendant Fails to Reinstate Missed Appeal Deadline for Traffic Violation and Obstruction Conviction
STK 2019 42
Revision Denied for Attempted Coercion and Insult Conviction
STK 2021 34
Petitioner's Revision Application Denied for Insufficient Grounds Against Criminal Judgment

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 19. Februar 2018 \n BEK 2017 126 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Alessandro Glogg. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Gesuchsteller, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, \n 8832 Wollerau, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n Revision, Nichtbeachten des Signals „Verbot, schädlichen Wellenschlag oder Sog zu erzeugen\" |\n

\n\n

\n (Revisionsgesuch gegen den Strafbefehl der Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln vom 2. Juni 2017, SUH 2017 899);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: