Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2017 121 • KG SZ BEK 2017 121 Generato dall'IA

Challenge to Discontinuance of Criminal Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 121
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant challenged the decision of the public prosecutor's office to discontinue criminal proceedings against the accused. The court considered whether the public prosecutor acted correctly in stopping the investigation, focusing on the evidential basis and the discretionary power granted to the prosecution in such matters, ultimately upholding the discontinuance order based on the assessment that the continuation of the proceedings was not justified given the established facts and legal framework regarding the closure of criminal investigations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO; Challenge to Discontinuance of Criminal Proceedings: The court considered whether the public prosecutor acted correctly in stopping the investigation, focusing on the evidential basis and the discretionary power granted to the prosecution in such matters, ultimately upholding the discontinuance order based on the assessment that the continuation of the proceedings was not justified given the established facts and legal framework regarding the closure of criminal investigations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione penale abbandono del procedimento chiusura dell'istruzione penale sequestro di mezzi di prova sindacato giurisdizionale diritti della difesa Einstellung Strafverfahren | Staatstanwaltschaft des Bezirks March

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

This provision was cited in order to reject the appeal as inadmissible.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO

This provision was cited to allocate the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 24. Januar 2018 \n BEK 2017 121 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen 1. C.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin D.________, 2. E.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdegegner, 3. Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt F.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft March vom 3. Juli 2017, SUM 2016 625);- \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: