Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2017 120 • KG SZ BEK 2017 120 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Termination of Forgery and Business Management Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 120
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves private complainants appealing a prosecutor's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings concerning forgery of documents, obtaining a false certification, and disloyal business management, where the prosecutor had terminated the investigation. The court, in its ruling, determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the complainants had failed to demonstrate that the prosecutor's decision to discontinue the proceedings was unlawful or arbitrary, thereby upholding the decision to terminate the criminal proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 358 Abs. 1 BStP, Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 360 Abs. 1 BStP, Art. 361 Abs. 1 BStP; Appeal Against Termination of Forgery and Business Management Proceedings: The court, in its ruling, determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the complainants had failed to demonstrate that the prosecutor's decision to discontinue the proceedings was unlawful or arbitrary, thereby upholding the decision to terminate the criminal proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedimento per falsità stralcio del procedimento inchiesta penale ricusazione del pubblico ministero perenzione del diritto amministrativo licenziamento per furto

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 358 Abs. 1 BStP
The appeal is dismissed as inadmissible under this provision.
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO
The appeal is dismissed as inadmissible under this provision, referencing the general admissibility rule for appeals against decisions not covered by specific appeal rights.
Art. 360 Abs. 1 BStP
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.
Art. 361 Abs. 1 BStP
The appellant is ordered to pay compensation for the respondent's necessary procedural expenses.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2022 69
Complainant's Appeal of Discontinued Forgery Proceedings Dismissed for Lack of Standing
BEK 2019 215
Complainant Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Forgery Proceedings
BEK 2024 159
Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2022 127
Appeal Against Termination of Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2019 130
Appeal of Discontinuance of Criminal Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 358 Abs. 1 BStP

The appeal is dismissed as inadmissible under this provision.

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

The appeal is dismissed as inadmissible under this provision, referencing the general admissibility rule for appeals against decisions not covered by specific appeal rights.

Art. 360 Abs. 1 BStP

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.

Art. 361 Abs. 1 BStP

The appellant is ordered to pay compensation for the respondent's necessary procedural expenses.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 15. Dezember 2017 \n BEK 2017 120 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, 2. B.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, SSB, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren (Urkundenfälschung, Erschleichung einer falschen Beurkundung, ungetreue Geschäftsbesorgung) |\n

\n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 29. Juni 2017, SUB 2015 641);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: