Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2017 114 • KG SZ BEK 2017 114 Generato dall'IA

Attachment Order Denial Against Foreign State Upheld for Insufficient Claim Evidence

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 114
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An applicant sought an attachment order against a foreign state, which was initially denied by the lower court. The applicant, appealing this decision, argued for the necessity of the attachment to secure a future claim against the foreign state. The appellate court upheld the denial, reasoning that an attachment order in this context requires the applicant to demonstrate a probable claim against the defendant, and the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence or justification to establish a credible basis for the underlying monetary claim against the foreign state that would warrant such a coercive measure.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Attachment Order Denial Against Foreign State Upheld for Insufficient Claim Evidence: The applicant, appealing this decision, argued for the necessity of the attachment to secure a future claim against the foreign state. The appellate court upheld the denial, reasoning that an attachment order in this context requires the applicant to demonstrate a probable claim against the defendant, and the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence or justification to establish a credible basis for the underlying monetary claim against the foreign state that would warrant such a coercive measure.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
concessione del sequestro stato estero prove credibili azione di risarcimento danni da sequestro credito futuro spossessamento conseguente al pignoramento March ER SchKG/Liq.-Sachen
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 179
Appeal Against Attachment Order Validity
BEK 2022 116
Appeal of Provisional Attachment Order
BEK 2019 209
Appeal of Attachment Order Validity
BEK 2019 11
Foreign State Appeal Against Provisional Attachment Dismissed
BEK 2018 41
Attachment Order Dispute Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 12. März 2018 \n BEK 2017 114 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Republik Usbekistan, 5 Mustaqillik Maydoni, House of Government, \n 700078 Tashkent, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Arrest |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 14. Juni 2017, ZES 2017 252);- \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: