Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2017 102 • KG SZ BEK 2017 102 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Definitive Legal Authorization for Debt Collection Based on Prior Judgment

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 102
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a lower court's decision regarding definitive legal authorization for debt collection. The dispute centers on whether a party is entitled to definitive legal authorization based on a claim arising from a prior judgment. The reviewing court considered the documentation presented and found that the initial decision regarding definitive legal authorization was correct, thereby dismissing the appeal and upholding the lower court's ruling concerning the enforcement proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Definitive Legal Authorization for Debt Collection Based on Prior Judgment: The dispute centers on whether a party is entitled to definitive legal authorization based on a claim arising from a prior judgment. The reviewing court considered the documentation presented and found that the initial decision regarding definitive legal authorization was correct, thereby dismissing the appeal and upholding the lower court's ruling concerning the enforcement proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
incasso decisione d'esecuzione rinvio pregiudiziale azione di accertamento diritto di prelazione legale lavoro sottoposto ad autorizzazione definitive Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung definitive
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 153
Appeal Regarding Definitive Legal Authorization for Debt Collection
BEK 2020 119
Appeal of Definitive Legal Authorization for Debt Collection
BEK 2017 70
Appeal of Definitive Authorization for Debt Enforcement
BEK 2024 92
Appeal Regarding Definitive Legal Authorization in Debt Enforcement
BEK 2022 180
Appeal Concerning Provisional Legal Authorization in Debt Collection

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 13. September 2017 \n BEK 2017 102 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin. Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Claude Brüesch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n Kanton Zürich, Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Zentrale Inkassostelle der Gerichte, Obergericht des Kantons Zürich, Postfach 2401, Hirschengraben 15, 8001 Zürich, gegen A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Einsiedeln vom 29. Mai 2017, ZES 2017 056);-

\n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: