Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2016 191 • KG SZ BEK 2016 191 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Allocation of Procedural Costs After Investigation Discontinuation

Numero d'incarto BEK 2016 191
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a prosecutor's decision regarding the cost consequences following the discontinuation of a criminal investigation. The court reviewed the appeal challenging the allocation of procedural costs after the case was dropped. The court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's ruling concerning the distribution of expenses, finding no legal error in the determination of who should bear the financial burden of the terminated proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Allocation of Procedural Costs After Investigation Discontinuation: The court reviewed the appeal challenging the allocation of procedural costs after the case was dropped. The court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's ruling concerning the distribution of expenses, finding no legal error in the determination of who should bear the financial burden of the terminated proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
spese per le indagini abbandono del procedimento ripartizione delle spese controllo della procedura condono delle spese procedurali principio di opportunità
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2017 104
Appeal Against Cost Allocation Following Discontinued Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2017 170
Appeal Regarding Imposition of Procedural Costs After Investigation Discontinuation Due to Insufficient Evidence
BEK 2020 121
Appeal Regarding Cost Allocation After Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings
GPR 2017 20
Appeal Against Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings Cost Allocation
BEK 2019 211
Prosecutor Discontinuance of Proceedings and Procedural Costs Imposition on Accused

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 24. März 2017 \n BEK 2016 191 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren (Entschädigungsfolgen) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln vom 25. November 2016, SUH 2011 1041);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: