Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2016 172 • KG SZ BEK 2016 172 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Refusal for Provisional Debt Collection Proceedings Based on Unenforceable Claim

Numero d'incarto BEK 2016 172
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner appealed a lower court's decision regarding provisional debt collection proceedings, specifically challenging the refusal to grant provisional relief in a debt enforcement matter initiated based on a document that was allegedly not an enforceable claim. The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the underlying document did not constitute a final judgment, arbitral award, or other officially recognized instrument establishing a clear, undisputed monetary claim sufficient to warrant the summary issuance of provisional debt collection proceedings under the relevant statute.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Refusal for Provisional Debt Collection Proceedings Based on Unenforceable Claim: The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the underlying document did not constitute a final judgment, arbitral award, or other officially recognized instrument establishing a clear, undisputed monetary claim sufficient to warrant the summary issuance of provisional debt collection proceedings under the relevant statute.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
credito in esecuzione esecuzione del lodo arbitrale debito pecuniario eccezione di incostituzionalità istanza tardiva di restituzione dei termini pagamento provvisorio provisorische Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung provisorische
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 24. April 2017 \n BEK 2016 172 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Florian Farner. |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________ |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n provisorische Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Einsiedeln vom 16. November 2016, ZES 2016 117);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: