Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2016 101 • KG SZ BEK 2016 101 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Discontinuance of Criminal Proceedings for Brawling, Assault, and Trespassing

Numero d'incarto BEK 2016 101
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private complainant appealed the public prosecutor's decision to discontinue proceedings concerning brawling, assault, and trespassing, asserting that the discontinuance was unwarranted given the factual basis of the initial report. The court reasoned that the dismissal was appropriate because the investigation revealed insufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for the charged offenses, thus justifying the decision to terminate the criminal proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Discontinuance of Criminal Proceedings for Brawling, Assault, and Trespassing: The court reasoned that the dismissal was appropriate because the investigation revealed insufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for the charged offenses, thus justifying the decision to terminate the criminal proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
dubbio ragionevole rissa inchiesta penale abbandono per lesioni personali abbandono del procedimento penale espulsione giudiziaria
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | |

|\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n

\n\n

\n

\n

\n

\n

\n

\n

\n Beschluss vom 31. Mai 2017

\n BEK 2016 101

\n

\n

\n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Josef Reichlin und Hannelore Räber, Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Patrick Neidhart. |\n

\n\n

\n

\n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________ |\n

\n\n

\n

\n

\n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren (Raufhandel, Tätlichkeiten / einfache Körperverletzung, Hausfriedensbruch) |\n

\n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Einstellungsverfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz vom 22. Juli 2016, SUI 2015 7307);-

\n

\n

\n hat die Beschwerdekammer,

\n

\n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: