Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ZZ.1996.28 • OG SO ZZ.1996.28 Generato dall'IA

Administrative Order Imposing Development Plan Requirement Subject to Judicial Review

Numero d'incarto ZZ.1996.28
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Soletta (CH-SO)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A challenge against an administrative order imposing a development plan requirement, which functions similarly to the establishment of a planning zone, is permissible via an administrative court appeal because such an order significantly affects private rights. The court reasoned that because the imposition of a development plan requirement directly dictates future development rights and restrictions on property, effectively operating as a substantial legislative measure impacting individuals, it constitutes a decision against which a constitutional complaint under Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights and relevant domestic procedural law is appropriate.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 6 Ziff. 1 EMRK; Administrative Order Imposing Development Plan Requirement Subject to Judicial Review: The court reasoned that because the imposition of a development plan requirement directly dictates future development rights and restrictions on property, effectively operating as a substantial legislative measure impacting individuals, it constitutes a decision against which a constitutional complaint under Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights and relevant domestic procedural law is appropriate.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
impugnazione di decisioni amministrative presupposto processuale sindacato giurisdizionale diritto allo sviluppo incentivazione immobiliare misura pianificatoria Gestaltungsplanpflicht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 6 Ziff. 1 EMRK
Art. 6 Ziff. 1 EMRK, § 134 Abs.
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

SOG 1996 Nr. 28

Art. 6 Ziff. 1 EMRK, § 134 Abs. 4 PBG*. *Gegen die Anordnung einer Gestaltungsplanpflicht, die wie der Erlass einer Planungszone wirkt, ist die Verwaltungsgerichtsbeschwerde zulässig.*

*Verwaltungsgericht, Urteil vom 30. August 1996*