Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
SK 05 24 • KG LU SK 05 24 Generato dall'IA

Tax Enforcement Authorization Despite Pending Liability Limitation Request

Numero d'incarto SK 05 24
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court granted definitive authorization for debt collection based on a final tax assessment despite the debtor's pending request to the tax office for a liability ruling that would limit their responsibility for the joint tax debt as a married person. The court reasoned that a request for a proportionate liability limitation under tax law can only suspend or prevent enforcement proceedings, including the authorization for debt collection, if it was filed *before* the creditor initiated the debt enforcement procedure; since the debtor filed this request only after the creditor applied for authorization of debt collection and served the response to that application, the request was deemed untimely and irrelevant to the enforcement court, which must grant authorization if the final assessment title requirements are otherwise met.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 80 Abs. 2 SchKG; § 20 StG (resp. § 17 aStG). Definitive Rechtsöffnung trotz hängigem Gesuch um anteilsmässige Beschränkung der Haftung für Steuerschuld. | Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
domanda d'esecuzione esecuzione della tassazione fiscale debito fiscale procedura fiscale procedura pendente responsabilità limitata

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 80 Abs. 2 SchKG

The definitive legal opening was granted based on this provision, as the debtor failed to produce a timely liability ruling.

§ 20 StG

Cited in conjunction with Art. 80 Abs. 2 SchKG regarding the substantive requirement for liability determination, although the request was deemed late.

§ 17 aStG

Cited in conjunction with Art. 80 Abs. 2 SchKG regarding the substantive requirement for liability determination, although the request was deemed late.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkurskommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 08.04.2005

Fallnummer: · SK 05 24

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 48

Leitsatz: · Art. 80 Abs. 2 SchKG; § 20 StG (resp. § 17 aStG). Definitive Rechtsöffnung trotz hängigem Gesuch um anteilsmässige Beschränkung der Haftung für Steuerschuld.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.