Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
SK 05 142 • KG LU SK 05 142 Generato dall'IA

Creditor v. Debtor (Website Listing Liquidated Damages)

Numero d'incarto SK 05 142
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In a debt collection matter where a creditor sought enforcement based on a written contract acknowledging debt for a website listing, the dispute concerned the extent to which a contractually agreed-upon liquidated damage clause (stipulated at 70% of the net price upon early termination) served as a provisional title for legal authorization. The court reasoned that the debt enforcement judge must summarily determine the permissible amount of a penalty or liquidated damage sum in the authorization procedure pursuant to relevant articles of the Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Act and the Code of Obligations; finding that the lower court's reduction of the liquidated damages to 15% of the net price was appropriate because, given the immediate cancellation just one business day after signing, this amount reasonably covered initial administrative costs while preventing compensation for work not yet performed, aligning with the principle that excessively high penalties must be judicially moderated.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 82 SchKG; Art. 163 Abs. 3 OR. Der Rechtsöffnungsrichter hat im Rechtsöffnungsverfahren die zulässige Höhe einer Konventionalstrafe oder einer Schadenspauschale auf summarische Weise festzulegen und hierfür Rechtsöffnung zu erteilen. | Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esecuzione per debiti disdetta offesa al credito oggetto della lite competenza in materia di contratti conclusi dai consumatori credito nel fallimento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 82 SchKG

Cited as the basis for granting provisional enforcement (Rechtsöffnung) based on the written recognition of debt.

Art. 163 Abs. 3 OR

Cited as the legal basis allowing the judge in the enforcement proceedings to summarily determine and reduce an excessively high penalty clause or fixed damages amount.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkurskommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 18.01.2006

Fallnummer: · SK 05 142

LGVE: · 2006 I Nr. 50

Leitsatz: · Art. 82 SchKG; Art. 163 Abs. 3 OR. Der Rechtsöffnungsrichter hat im Rechtsöffnungsverfahren die zulässige Höhe einer Konventionalstrafe oder einer Schadenspauschale auf summarische Weise festzulegen und hierfür Rechtsöffnung zu erteilen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.