Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
SK 05 100 • KG LU SK 05 100 Generato dall'IA

Recognition of Austrian Judgment Upheld Despite Service Objection Under Lugano Convention

Numero d'incarto SK 05 100
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court upheld the declaration of enforceability of an Austrian judgment ordering payment, rejecting the objection that the judgment was not properly served, which the defendant claimed violated their right to be heard under the Lugano Convention (LugÜ). The court reasoned that the validity and timeliness of service, including substitute service upon a court-appointed curator, are governed by the law of the originating state (Austria), and Austrian law permits such service, which was deemed effective and timely. Furthermore, the court concluded that substitute service upon a curator under Austrian law does not violate the fundamental principles of Swiss procedural public policy (ordre public) as required for refusing recognition under LugÜ, nor can complaints regarding procedural errors or alleged constitutional/ECHR violations be considered outside the narrowly defined grounds for refusal under Article 27 of the LugÜ.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 27 Ziff. 1 und 2 LugÜ; Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV. Vollstreckbarerklärung eines österreichischen Urteils. Ob eine Zustellung ordnungsgemäss und rechtzeitig im Sinne des LugÜ erfolgt ist und ob eine Ersatzzustellung zulässig ist, richtet sich nach dem nationalen Recht des Urteilsstaats. Wirksame Ersatzzustellung an einen Kurator nach österreichischem Recht. Keine Verletzung des prozessualen Ordre public. Verfahrensfehler dürfen nur im Rahmen der Anerkennungsverweigerungsgründe nach Art. 27 Ziff. 1 und 2 LugÜ berücksichtigt werden. | Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
convenzione di Lugano dichiarazione di esecutività riconoscimento di uno Stato validità della notificazione riconoscimento della decisione censure procedurali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV
1 und 2 LugÜ; Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV.
Art. 27 Ziff. 2 Lug
Leitsatz: · Art. 27 Ziff.
Art. 27 Ziff. 1 Lug
Leitsatz: · Art. 27 Ziff.
Art. 29 BV
The court dismissed direct application of this article because Article 29 LugÜ restricts review to the grounds listed in Article 27 LugÜ.
Art. 6 EMRK
Art. 29 Lug
1 und 2 LugÜ; Art. 29 Abs.
Art. 27 Ziff. 1 oder
Leitsatz: · Art. 27 Ziff.
Art. 26 EuGV

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 126 III 534
Swiss Federal Supreme Court Recognizes Gambling Debt Enforcement Under Lugano Convention
BGE 116 II 634
Contractor v. Subcontractor (ICC Arbitration, Public Policy Review)
Generato dall'IA
SK 97 171
Enforcement of German Default Judgment Under Lugano Convention
SK 99 65
Enforceability of German Payment Order under Lugano Convention: Service Validity and Documentary Proof
2C 24 80
Enforcement of Foreign Judgment Under Lugano Convention: Procedural Compliance and Limited Review
SK 05 81
Enforcement of Foreign Public Instrument and Stay under Lugano Convention
OG 1991 34
Lugano Convention Impact on Swiss Civil Procedure for Recognition and Enforcement

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 27 Ziff. 1 und 2 LugÜ

The court confirmed that the non-recognition grounds under these articles were not met, thereby upholding the recognition of the foreign judgment.

Art. 29 BV

The court dismissed direct application of this article because Article 29 LugÜ restricts review to the grounds listed in Article 27 LugÜ.

Art. 29 LugÜ

Cited as the provision preventing review of the merits of the foreign decision and limiting procedural challenges to the grounds in Art. 27 LugÜ.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkurskommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 12.12.2005

Fallnummer: · SK 05 100

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 43

Leitsatz: · Art. 27 Ziff. 1 und 2 LugÜ; Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV. Vollstreckbarerklärung eines österreichischen Urteils. Ob eine Zustellung ordnungsgemäss und rechtzeitig im Sinne des LugÜ erfolgt ist und ob eine Ersatzzustellung zulässig ist, richtet sich nach dem nationalen Recht des Urteilsstaats. Wirksame Ersatzzustellung an einen Kurator nach österreichischem Recht. Keine Verletzung des prozessualen Ordre public. Verfahrensfehler dürfen nur im Rahmen der Anerkennungsverweigerungsgründe nach Art. 27 Ziff. 1 und 2 LugÜ berücksichtigt werden.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.