Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KA 97 22 49 • KG LU KA 97 22 49 Generato dall'IA

Statutory Counsel Appointment and Pre-Trial Detention Duration

Numero d'incarto KA 97 22 49
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court addressed whether the mandatory appointment of defense counsel under a specific procedural statute applies when pre-trial detention has not been continuous for a full month. The appellate court determined that since the detention period in question did not last uninterruptedly for more than one month, the condition specified in the statute for mandatory defense representation was not met, leading to the conclusion that there was no requirement for the necessary defense appointment in this case.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

§ 33 Abs. 3 Ziff. 1 StPO. Hat die Untersuchungshaft nicht ununterbrochen länger als einen Monat gedauert, liegt kein Fall der notwendigen Verteidigung im Sinne von § 33 Abs. 3 Ziff. 1 StPO vor. | Strafprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
nomina del difensore carcerazione preventiva difesa obbligatoria presupposto processuale ritardo del ministero pubblico diritti della difesa
Generato dall'IA
21 05 184
Mandatory Counsel in Pre-Trial Investigation Absent Statutory Necessity
OG 1995 56
Appellate Commission Ruling on Official Defense Counsel Appointment Eligibility
OG 1994 63
Denial of Retroactive Appointment of Defense Counsel
21 99 257
Defense Counsel Appeal Premature Pending Defendant Service
OG 1991 64
Investigating Authority Scheduling Discretion vs. Defense Counsel Rights

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Kriminal- und Anklagekommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 21.04.1997

Fallnummer: · KA 97 22/49

LGVE: · 1997 I Nr. 62

Leitsatz: · § 33 Abs. 3 Ziff. 1 StPO. Hat die Untersuchungshaft nicht ununterbrochen länger als einen Monat gedauert, liegt kein Fall der notwendigen Verteidigung im Sinne von § 33 Abs. 3 Ziff. 1 StPO vor.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.

Entscheid: