Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KA 04 171 1 • KG LU KA 04 171 1 Generato dall'IA

Accused Evading Investigation Denied Appointed Counsel

Numero d'incarto KA 04 171 1
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The accused appealed an official decision denying legal counsel because she was evading the criminal investigation by remaining in hiding and not participating in any investigative actions. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that while the law provides for official defense, there is no current practical necessity for counsel when the accused actively avoids the proceedings and thus cannot benefit from such assistance at that stage.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

§ 34 StPO. Kein Anspruch auf amtliche Verteidigung, solange die angeschuldigte Person untergetaucht bleibt und sich keinen Untersuchungshandlungen unterzieht. | Strafprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
patrocinio gratuito inchiesta penale mancanza di prova difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico patrocinio non autorizzato motivo vertente sullo sviamento di potere

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 34 StPO
The court upheld the refusal of official defense because the accused remained in hiding and did not submit to investigative actions.
Generato dall'IA
OG 1996 52
Defamation Accused's Request for Appointed Counsel Denied
KA 96 76 1
Appeal Procedure for Refusal of Requested Defense Counsel
KA 05 56
Criminal Proceedings and Denial of Appointed Counsel in Alien Law Violations
KA 04 171 2
Denial of Defense Access to Investigation Files Upheld in Abduction Case
JK 05 32
Parentage Challenge: Denial of Appointed Counsel

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 34 StPO

The court upheld the refusal of official defense because the accused remained in hiding and did not submit to investigative actions.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Kriminal- und Anklagekommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 03.01.2005

Fallnummer: · KA 04 171.1

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 62

Leitsatz: · § 34 StPO. Kein Anspruch auf amtliche Verteidigung, solange die angeschuldigte Person untergetaucht bleibt und sich keinen Untersuchungshandlungen unterzieht.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.