Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KA 03 116 • KG LU KA 03 116 Generato dall'IA

Public Defender Appointment: Case-by-Case Assessment Required

Numero d'incarto KA 03 116
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An accused person appealing a decision regarding the appointment of a public defender for numerous ongoing criminal proceedings argued for a blanket appointment across all cases, which the court rejected because there is no legal entitlement to have all pending proceedings unified or assigned a single public defender. The court reasoned that the appointment of a public defender under the relevant statute must be assessed concretely in each individual case based on factors like the significance and complexity of that specific matter, rather than aggregating all pending cases to bypass the statutory requirements for official defense.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

§ 34 Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 StPO. Amtliche Verteidigung: Es besteht kein Anspruch des Angeschuldigten, dass ihm gesamthaft für alle gegen ihn laufenden Verfahren ein amtlicher Verteidiger beigegeben werde. Es ist in jedem einzelnen Fall konkret zu prüfen, ob die Voraussetzungen für eine Offizialverteidigung erfüllt sind oder nicht. | Strafprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
nomina di un impiegato statale complessità della procedura patrocinio gratuito querela valutazioni di significatività diritti della difesa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 34 Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 StPO
This provision was explicitly cited in the decision's conclusion to determine the criteria for official defense in individual cases.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
6S.414/2002
Federal Supreme Court Ruling on Procedural Separation in Aggravated Embezzlement and Forgery Case
Generato dall'IA
KA 97 22 49
Statutory Counsel Appointment and Pre-Trial Detention Duration
OG 1995 56
Appellate Commission Ruling on Official Defense Counsel Appointment Eligibility
KA 04 117
Right to Appointed Counsel for Indigent Detainee in Psychiatric Facility
KA 96 76 1
Appeal Procedure for Refusal of Requested Defense Counsel
KA 05 142
Prosecutor's Inferred Request and Cost Allocation in Dismissed Criminal Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 34 Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 StPO

This provision was explicitly cited in the decision's conclusion to determine the criteria for official defense in individual cases.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Kriminal- und Anklagekommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 02.12.2003

Fallnummer: · KA 03 116

LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 64

Leitsatz: · § 34 Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 StPO. Amtliche Verteidigung: Es besteht kein Anspruch des Angeschuldigten, dass ihm gesamthaft für alle gegen ihn laufenden Verfahren ein amtlicher Verteidiger beigegeben werde. Es ist in jedem einzelnen Fall konkret zu prüfen, ob die Voraussetzungen für eine Offizialverteidigung erfüllt sind oder nicht.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.