Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
JK 05 9 1 • KG LU JK 05 9 1 Generato dall'IA

Land Registry Transfer Rejection Due to Missing Commercial Register Extract

Numero d'incarto JK 05 9 1
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns the rejection by the land registry office of an application to record the transfer of an agricultural business, spanning property in two cantons, under the Merger Act, which also involved the establishment of a lifelong right of residence and a right of first refusal. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that while the Merger Act permits a single public document for the transfer of land located across different cantons, the applicant failed to provide the required certified extract from the Commercial Register as mandated by the Cantonal Land Registry Ordinance to prove the transfer of ownership, rendering the registration inadmissible despite the simplified procedure offered by the Merger Act for such transfers.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

§ 3 Abs. 2 BeurkG; Art. 18a Abs. 1 lit. f GBV; Art. 70 Abs. 2 FusG. Für die Übertragung von Grundstücken nach FusG in verschiedenen Kantonen genügt eine einzige öffentliche Urkunde. | Beurkundungsrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
registro di commercio trasferimento della proprietà domanda e procedimento di registrazione fondo agricolo diritto di soggiorno documenti mancanti

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 125 IV 81
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 70 Abs. 2 FusG

This provision is explicitly mentioned in the decision's summary/heading which states the main finding regarding the sufficiency of a single public deed for cross-cantonal property transfers under the Merger Act (FusG).

Art. 18a Abs. 1 lit. f GBV

This provision, requiring a certified extract from the commercial register, is cited in the reasoning that leads to the ultimate confirmation of the refusal to register the transfer.

Art. 966 ZGB

This provision is cited in the final sentence of the substantive reasoning section to justify that the registration refusal was ultimately lawful.

Art. 24 Abs. 1 GBV

This provision is cited in the final sentence of the substantive reasoning section to justify that the registration refusal was ultimately lawful.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Justizkommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Beurkundungsrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 02.06.2005

Fallnummer: · JK 05 9.1

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 26

Leitsatz: · § 3 Abs. 2 BeurkG; Art. 18a Abs. 1 lit. f GBV; Art. 70 Abs. 2 FusG. Für die Übertragung von Grundstücken nach FusG in verschiedenen Kantonen genügt eine einzige öffentliche Urkunde.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.