Self-Employed Applicant's Burden of Proof in Free Legal Aid Proceedings
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAIn an appeal concerning the denial of free legal aid (unentgeltliche Rechtspflege, UR), the commission addressed the disclosure obligations of a self-employed UR applicant, asserting that the investigative principle in UR proceedings does not relieve the applicant of the comprehensive duty to prove their financial need. The court reasoned that a self-employed applicant must provide a complete and verifiable picture of their finances, including income, assets, debts, and third-party support, and bears the burden of proof and risk for any ambiguities; failure to present a coherent financial picture due to a breach of this duty justifies the rejection of the UR application, and appellate courts are not required to grant a second opportunity for disclosure.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IASelf-Employed Applicant's Burden of Proof in Free Legal Aid Proceedings: Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · Justizkommission Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht Entscheiddatum: · 04.05.2005 Fallnummer: · JK 05 15 LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 34 Leitsatz: · § 130 Abs. 1 ZPO. Mitwirkungspflicht eines UR-Gesuchstellers, der selbständig erwerbend ist. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IAGiurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · Justizkommission Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht Entscheiddatum: · 04.05.2005 Fallnummer: · JK 05 15 LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 34 Leitsatz: · § 130 Abs. 1 ZPO. Mitwirkungspflicht eines UR-Gesuchstellers, der selbständig erwerbend ist. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.