Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
30 05 3 • KG LU 30 05 3 Generato dall'IA

Couple Fined for Failing to Return Child Subject to Adoption Denial Upheld

Numero d'incarto 30 05 3
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A couple, who had been denied permission to care for a child with the intent of adoption and were ordered to return the child, appealed an administrative decision imposing disciplinary fines for failing to comply. The court determined that the administrative fine imposed under the relevant regulation concerning the placement of children was not criminal in nature, but rather a coercive measure arising from a special legal relationship between the applicants and the state as potential foster/adoptive parents, which lacked the punitive character required to invoke the procedural guarantees of Article 6 EMRK, thus affirming that no right to a public hearing existed.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 6 Ziff. 1 und 7 EMRK. Eine Ordnungsbusse gemäss Art. 26 Abs. 1 der Verordnung über die Aufnahme von Kindern zur Pflege und zur Adoption (PAVO) ist nicht strafrechtlicher Natur. Damit besteht auch kein Anspruch auf die Verfahrensgarantien gemäss Art. 6 Ziff. 1 EMRK; insbesondere ist keine öffentliche Gerichtsverhandlung durchzuführen. | Verwaltungsverfahrensrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
adozione rapporto di affidamento familiare ritorno del minore diritti del bambino diritto al ritorno audizione del figlio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 6 Ziff. 1 EMRK
Damit besteht auch kein Anspruch auf die Verfahrensgarantien gemäss Art. 6 Ziff. 1 EMRK; insbesondere ist keine öffentliche Gerichtsverhandlung durchzuführen.
Art. 26 Abs. 1 PAVO
The provision under which the administrative fine was imposed, which the court ruled was not criminal in nature, thus denying the requested procedural guarantees.
Art. 292 StGB
Art. 6 EMRK
Leitsatz: · Art. 6 Ziff.
Art. 7 EMRK
Art. 32 BV

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 128 I 346
Attorney Discipline Fine Validity Under ECHR Articles 6 and 7
1P.102/2000
Parental Failure to Ensure School Attendance Fine Upheld
BGE 121 I 379
Teacher's Disciplinary Fine Not a Criminal Charge under ECHR Article 6(1)
BGE 126 I 228
Lawyer Disciplinary Action and Denial of Public Hearing Under Article 6 ECHR
Generato dall'IA
RRE Nr 1240
Appeal Against Residence Permit Denial Due to Foreign Adoption Classification
22 04 116
Hague Convention Return Denial Upheld Based on Children's Will
Rsth L 2003 9
Adoption Jurisdiction and Best Interest Determination
3H 11 14
Adult Adoption Upheld Despite Biological Parent Relationship

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 26 Abs. 1 PAVO

The provision under which the administrative fine was imposed, which the court ruled was not criminal in nature, thus denying the requested procedural guarantees.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Verwaltungsverfahrensrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 09.06.2005

Fallnummer: · 30 05 3

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 39

Leitsatz: · Art. 6 Ziff. 1 und 7 EMRK. Eine Ordnungsbusse gemäss Art. 26 Abs. 1 der Verordnung über die Aufnahme von Kindern zur Pflege und zur Adoption (PAVO) ist nicht strafrechtlicher Natur. Damit besteht auch kein Anspruch auf die Verfahrensgarantien gemäss Art. 6 Ziff. 1 EMRK; insbesondere ist keine öffentliche Gerichtsverhandlung durchzuführen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.