Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
22 10 35 • KG LU 22 10 35 Generato dall'IA

Modification of Post-Divorce Support Upon Remarriage: Prioritization and Calculation of Obligor's Capacity

Numero d'incarto 22 10 35
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In a judgment modification case concerning post-divorce support obligations following the obligor's remarriage, the court affirmed that the obligor's duty to support the former spouse is generally equal in rank to the duty owed to the new spouse, but the support claim for minor children takes priority. The court reasoned that the new spouse has a legal duty to assist the obligor, potentially requiring self-restraint, and special efforts can be demanded from the obligor and the new spouse (who knew of the existing obligations) to maintain prior support levels; however, this duty is limited to ensuring the obligor could pay the support even if unmarried, meaning the new spouse cannot indirectly support the former spouse, necessitating a calculation of the obligor's needs as a single person while accounting for shared living expenses without an automatic reduction based on the cohabitation.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 159 Abs. 3, 278 Abs. 2 und 285 ZGB. Unterhaltspflicht des Klägers gegenüber der Beklagten und seiner neuen Ehefrau ist grundsätzlich gleichrangig. Beistandspflicht der neuen Ehefrau. Unterhaltsanspruch der unmündigen Kinder ist prioritär. | Familienrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
nuove nozze coniuge modifica del mantenimento post-divorzio obbligo di assistenza celibe godimento dei diritti civili

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 79 II 137
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 25.06.2010

Fallnummer: · 22 10 35

LGVE: · 2010 I Nr. 2

Leitsatz: · Art. 159 Abs. 3, 278 Abs. 2 und 285 ZGB. Unterhaltspflicht des Klägers gegenüber der Beklagten und seiner neuen Ehefrau ist grundsätzlich gleichrangig. Beistandspflicht der neuen Ehefrau. Unterhaltsanspruch der unmündigen Kinder ist prioritär.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.