Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
22 10 125 • KG LU 22 10 125 Generato dall'IA

Parental Rights Mediation Upheld Against Liberty Challenge

Numero d'incarto 22 10 125
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In a dispute regarding parental rights, the lower court ordered the parties to participate in mandatory, expert-led mediation aimed at restoring the children's contact with their father, which the mother appealed as an infringement of her personal liberty. The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the mandatory mediation, authorized by relevant civil code provisions, constituted a permissible limitation of the fundamental right to personal freedom under constitutional law because it was based on a formal legal act, served the overriding public and private interest in maintaining the children's crucial relationship with their father, was proportionate as it did not impose direct enforcement measures on the children, and did not violate the core content of the mother's freedom since she remained free to express herself in the sessions.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 10 Abs. 2 BV; Art. 307 Abs. 3 ZGB. Die Anordnung einer Zwangsmediation zur Wiederherstellung des Kontakts der Kinder zu ihrem Vater stellt keinen unzulässigen Eingriff in die persönliche Freiheit dar. | Zivilrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
conflitto genitoriale diritto alla libertà diritti del bambino legge d'applicazione immediata autorità parentale decisione d'esecuzione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 10 Abs. 2 BV
Leitsatz: · Art. 10 Abs. 2 BV; Art.
Art. 307 Abs. 3 ZGB
2 BV; Art. 307 Abs. 3 ZGB.
Art. 137 ZGB
Art. 36 BV
Art. 307 ZGB
Leitsatz: · Art. 10 Abs. 2 BV; Art. 307 Abs. 3 ZGB. Die Anordnung einer Zwangsmediation zur Wiederherstellung des Kontakts der Kinder zu ihrem Vater stellt keinen unzulässigen Eingriff in die persönliche Freiheit dar.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 127 I 6
P. v. Compulsory Neuroleptic Treatment in Psychiatric Custody
Generato dall'IA
3H 17 14
Mediation as Child Protection for Visitation Disputes
30 04 27
Child Welfare Over Parental Rights in Foster Placement
3H 14 75
Child Visitation Exchange Modalities Dispute
3B 12 33
Independent Right to Paternity Determination Outside Status Action

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · 3. Abteilung

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 25.02.2011

Fallnummer: · 22 10 125

LGVE: · 2011 I Nr. 1

Leitsatz: · Art. 10 Abs. 2 BV; Art. 307 Abs. 3 ZGB. Die Anordnung einer Zwangsmediation zur Wiederherstellung des Kontakts der Kinder zu ihrem Vater stellt keinen unzulässigen Eingriff in die persönliche Freiheit dar.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.