Marital Protection Proceedings: Necessity of Comprehensive Judgment on Ancillary Issues

The appellant contested a partial decision in marital protection proceedings that ruled on separation, child custody, and vacating the marital home, while explicitly omitting any ruling on maintenance obligations. The court held that, by analogy with divorce proceedings where the principle of the unity of the judgment is mandatory, marital protection proceedings under Articles 175 et seq. of the Civil Code also require a comprehensive decision covering all ancillary consequences of separation, meaning it is impermissible to decide on only some issues and refer others to a separate ruling against the opposing party's will, especially since issues like housing arrangements are interconnected with economic circumstances like maintenance.