Support Payments Versus Vested Pension Benefits Seizure
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAFollowing a divorce decree ordering spousal and child support payments, the recipient sought to secure these amounts by ordering the seizure and payment from the obligor's vested benefits (Freizügigkeitsguthaben). The court ruled that under relevant federal law, security measures and debtor assignments for support payments against vested benefits accounts can only be executed upon the actual lump-sum payout of the funds, which occurs either upon withdrawal under specific provisions, reaching the statutory retirement age, or in the event of disability, because the funds must otherwise remain within the protected pension scheme circulation. Consequently, the lower court's decision to secure the vested benefits and order payments was overturned because the account holder had not requested a lump-sum payout.
Regesto Legislator
UfficialeArt. 132 Abs. 1 und 2; Art. 291 und 292 ZGB; Art. 5 FZG. Die Sicherstellung und die Schuldneranweisung für Unterhaltsbeiträge können bei einem Freizügigkeitsguthaben erst im Barauszahlungsfall nach Art. 5 FZG oder nach Erreichen des AHV-Alters oder bei Invalidität des Versicherten erfolgen. | Familienrecht
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAGiurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis provision concerns the security/safeguarding measures which the court ultimately ruled could not be maintained against the vested benefits account.
This provision concerns the assignment to the creditor, which the court ruled could not be made because no assets were secured.
This provision concerns the assignment to the creditor, which the court ruled could not be made because no assets were secured.
This provision defines the conditions under which a vested benefits account can be paid out in cash, which the court used as the crucial factor preventing the securing of the funds.
Testo completo
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht
Abteilung: · II. Kammer
Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht
Entscheiddatum: · 12.01.2006
Fallnummer: · 22 05 113
LGVE: · 2006 I Nr. 2
Leitsatz: · Art. 132 Abs. 1 und 2; Art. 291 und 292 ZGB; Art. 5 FZG. Die Sicherstellung und die Schuldneranweisung für Unterhaltsbeiträge können bei einem Freizügigkeitsguthaben erst im Barauszahlungsfall nach Art. 5 FZG oder nach Erreichen des AHV-Alters oder bei Invalidität des Versicherten erfolgen.
Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.