Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
22 04 104 • KG LU 22 04 104 Generato dall'IA

Admissibility of New Facts in Appeal Procedure

Numero d'incarto 22 04 104
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court confirmed the established case law that new facts or evidence (Noven) are generally inadmissible after the exchange of written pleadings in the appeal procedure, as established by the relevant procedural statute. However, the court reasoned that new factual assertions raised by a party during a court-ordered examination, provided they are closely related to the already submitted issues, may be considered, even if they arise after the deadline for submitting appeal responses, in the interest of a factually correct outcome and judicial economy.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

§ 262 ZPO. Noven sind nach Abschluss des Rechtsschriftenwechsels im Rekursverfahren grundsätzlich unzulässig (Bestätigung der bisherigen Rechtsprechung). Neue Tatsachen, die nach Ablauf der Rekurs- bzw. Rekursantwortfrist im Rahmen der Parteibefragung vorgebracht werden, dürfen berücksichtigt werden. | Zivilprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
fatti nuovi e nuove prove diritto processuale decisioni incidentali impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio qualificazione giuridica dei fatti diritto alla prova

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 179 Abs. 1 ZGB
Cited in connection with the possibility of filing a motion for amendment if new facts are ignored.
Art. 179 ZGB
§ 262 ZPO
Cited as the basis for the rule that new facts and evidence are generally inadmissible in appeal proceedings after the exchange of briefs.
§ 238 ZPO
Cited to state that a decision issued in summary proceedings only has limited legal force.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 128 III 411
Principle of Investigation in Child Support and Interdependence with Spousal Support
BGE 129 III 417
Husband Appeals Spousal Support Increase Violating *Reformatio in Peius*
BGE 123 III 1
Jurisdictional Dispute on Setting Maintenance Below Obligor's Minimum Subsistence
Generato dall'IA
OG 1995 39
Inadmissibility of Late Evidentiary Submissions in Appeals
11 97 23 242
Appeal on Procedural Prohibition of New Evidence in Nullity Proceedings
1B 11 24
Admissibility of New Evidence in Appeal Proceedings Under CPC Article 317 (1)
OG 1993 21
Inadmissibility of New Evidence in Appeal Proceedings After Deadline Expiry

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 262 ZPO

Cited as the basis for the rule that new facts and evidence are generally inadmissible in appeal proceedings after the exchange of briefs.

Art. 179 Abs. 1 ZGB

Cited in connection with the possibility of filing a motion for amendment if new facts are ignored.

§ 238 ZPO

Cited to state that a decision issued in summary proceedings only has limited legal force.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 24.11.2004

Fallnummer: · 22 04 104

LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 43

Leitsatz: · § 262 ZPO. Noven sind nach Abschluss des Rechtsschriftenwechsels im Rekursverfahren grundsätzlich unzulässig (Bestätigung der bisherigen Rechtsprechung). Neue Tatsachen, die nach Ablauf der Rekurs- bzw. Rekursantwortfrist im Rahmen der Parteibefragung vorgebracht werden, dürfen berücksichtigt werden.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.