Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
22 03 20 • KG LU 22 03 20 Generato dall'IA

Paternity Suit DNA Test Granted Without Hearing Overturned

Numero d'incarto 22 03 20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio annulled

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In a pending paternity suit, a request for preliminary evidence, specifically a DNA test, was granted without hearing the opposing party, prompting an appeal. The court overturned the lower court's evidence order, reasoning that under constitutional guarantees, the opposing party in preliminary evidence proceedings must generally be heard to ensure their right to legal representation and participation, unless an urgent risk justifies immediate action, and that the decision must also be reasoned and include instructions on appeal rights; the court found that the failure to solicit a response and provide a sufficient explanation constituted a violation of the right to be heard that was not cured by the appeal itself.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

§§ 228 und 232 Abs. 1 ZPO; Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV. Verletzung des rechtlichen Gehörs. Im Verfahren betreffend vorsorgliche Beweisabnahme ist die Gegenpartei grundsätzlich anzuhören; der Entscheid ist zu begründen und mit einer Rechtsmittelbelehrung zu versehen. | Zivilprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione di paternità diritto di essere sentito mancanza di prova decisione pregiudiziale procedura pendente diritto di conoscere i propri ascendenti

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 232 Abs. 1 ZPO

Cited as one of the bases for annulling the decision due to violation of the right to be heard in the context of preliminary evidence taking.

§ 228 ZPO

Cited as one of the bases for annulling the decision, as it regulates the preliminary evidence taking procedure.

Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV

Cited as one of the bases for annulling the decision due to violation of the constitutional right to be heard.

§ 61 Abs. 1 ZPO

Cited as the procedural basis for annulling the preliminary evidence taking decision due to the violation of the right to be heard.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 13.05.2003

Fallnummer: · 22 03 20

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 44

Leitsatz: · §§ 228 und 232 Abs. 1 ZPO; Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV. Verletzung des rechtlichen Gehörs. Im Verfahren betreffend vorsorgliche Beweisabnahme ist die Gegenpartei grundsätzlich anzuhören; der Entscheid ist zu begründen und mit einer Rechtsmittelbelehrung zu versehen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.