Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
21 08 55 • KG LU 21 08 55 Generato dall'IA

Appellate Court Overturns Battery Conviction Based on Insufficient Proof of Pattern

Numero d'incarto 21 08 55
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court overturned a lower court's conviction for repeated battery under Article 126 (2)(a) of the Penal Code, where the accused was charged with assaulting his daughter on a single specified date, with the lower court relying only on prior, years-old investigation records to establish repetition. The appellate court reasoned that for a prosecution ex officio under this provision, the legislature intended for battery to be considered "repeated" only if the acts are numerous and systematic, occurring in close temporal proximity, such that they constitute a pattern or habit, and that a single incident cannot be aggregated with unsubstantiated or very old prior allegations to meet this threshold.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 126 Abs. 2 lit. a StGB. Wiederholte Tatbegehung liegt nach dem Willen des Gesetzgebers vor, wenn Tätlichkeiten zahlreich und systematisch verabreicht werden, seien diese auch nur in kurzen zeitlichen Abständen erfolgt. | Strafprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
reiterazione di reati penali indagine preliminare sequestro di mezzi di prova diritto processuale abbandono per lesioni personali detenzione di stupefacenti

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 126 Abs. 2 lit. a StGB
Leitsatz: · Art. 126 Abs. 2 lit. a StGB.
Art. 126 Abs. 2 StGB
Leitsatz: · Art. 126 Abs.
Art. 126 StGB
Leitsatz: · Art. 126 Abs.
Generato dall'IA
21 08 22
Excessive Self-Defense in Battery Case Regarding Martial Arts Training
2N 14 127
Statute of Limitations Tolling Upon First-Instance Conviction Despite Subsequent Reversal and Remand
KA 03 47
Private Complainant's Cost Appeal in Battery Penalty Order Dismissed
21 06 100 3
Appeal Conviction Reversal and Prohibition on Worsening Appellant's Position
21 08 172
Conviction Upheld; Forensic Measure Denied Due to Timing of Abnormal Mental State

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 02.06.2008

Fallnummer: · 21 08 55

LGVE: · 2008 I Nr. 48

Leitsatz: · Art. 126 Abs. 2 lit. a StGB. Wiederholte Tatbegehung liegt nach dem Willen des Gesetzgebers vor, wenn Tätlichkeiten zahlreich und systematisch verabreicht werden, seien diese auch nur in kurzen zeitlichen Abständen erfolgt.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.