Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
21 08 123 • KG LU 21 08 123 Generato dall'IA

Dormicum Offenses: Quantitatively Severe Case Upheld

Numero d'incarto 21 08 123
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision that the defendant's offenses involving the drug Dormicum constituted a quantitatively severe case under Article 19 Paragraph 2 lit. a of the Narcotics Act. The court reasoned that the threshold for a severe case, previously established by 1999 expert opinions based on the psychoactive substance Midazolam's potential for dependency and lethal mixed intoxications (set at 27 or 36 grams), remained valid despite the age of the reports, as the defendant provided no new scientific evidence to discredit them, and current knowledge confirms the significant dangers and risks associated with benzodiazepines like Midazolam, noting that the defendant significantly exceeded the threshold quantity of 2,400 tablets (36,000 mg).

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG, Art. 1 BetmG, Art. 19 Ziff. 1 BetmG; Dormicum Offenses: Quantitatively Severe Case Upheld: a of the Narcotics Act. The court reasoned that the threshold for a severe case, previously established by 1999 expert opinions based on the psychoactive substance Midazolam's potential for dependency and lethal mixed intoxications (set at 27 or 36 grams), remained valid despite the age of the reports, as the defendant provided no new scientific evidence to discredit them, and current knowledge confirms the significant dangers and risks associated with benzodiazepines like Midazolam, noting that the defendant significantly exceeded the threshold quantity of 2,400 tablets (36,000 mg).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
reati della legge sugli stupefacenti dipendenza da sostanze caso di media gravità nuovo mezzo di prova reati contro la sicurezza dei rapporti giuridici perizia giudiziaria

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG
This article is cited as the basis for qualifying the offense as a quantitatively serious case (mengenmässig schwerer Fall) in the final decision.
Art. 1 BetmG
Leitsatz: · Art. 19 Ziff.
Art. 19 Ziff. 1 BetmG
The accused is held guilty of multiple violations of this article, committed as a serious case under Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG.
Generato dall'IA
21 02 285
Appellate Court Decision on Provisional Criminal Confinement of Involuntarily Committed Individual
21 09 42
Challenge to Urgent Inpatient Psychiatric Order Based on Insufficient Medical Urgency
V 05 103 2
Expulsion Upheld Due to Severe Criminal Conviction Despite Long Residency
22 08 7
Ne Bis In Idem and Bodily Harm Charges Following Lesser Offense Penal Order

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG

This article is cited as the basis for qualifying the offense as a quantitatively serious case (mengenmässig schwerer Fall) in the final decision.

Art. 19 Ziff. 1 BetmG

The accused is held guilty of multiple violations of this article, committed as a serious case under Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 16.12.2008

Fallnummer: · 21 08 123

LGVE: · 2009 I Nr. 52

Leitsatz: · Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG. Mengenmässig schwerer Fall nach Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG mit dem Medikament Dormicum.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.