Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
21 06 118 • KG LU 21 06 118 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Bar on Custody Release Applications

Numero d'incarto 21 06 118
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court addressed an appeal challenging a two-month bar imposed by a magistrate on the submission of personal applications for release from custody, finding that such a bar, despite lacking explicit statutory basis in the relevant criminal procedure code, can be ordered by a judge based on the general prohibition of the abuse of rights (Art. 2 Abs. 2 ZGB) to counter manifestly abusive or dilatory release requests, consistent with constitutional and ECHR guarantees. However, the court reduced the imposed two-month period to one month, reasoning that procedural rights regarding custody review are severely restricted, and although a bar is permissible to prevent abuse, a period exceeding one month is generally disproportionate unless exceptional circumstances, not sufficiently justified by the magistrate, warrant a longer duration, especially when the applicant's behavior suggests a systematic attempt to hinder the proceedings rather than seek a genuine review based on changed facts.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 10 Abs. 2 und 31 Abs. 4 BV; Art. 5 Ziff. 4 EMRK; Art. 2 Abs. 2 ZGB. Unabhängig von einer gesetzlichen Grundlage in der StPO kann der Haftrichter gestützt auf das allgemeine Rechtsmissbrauchsverbot gegen missbräuchliche Haftentlassungsgesuche eine Haftprüfungssperre anordnen. Dauer der Sperrfrist. | Zivilprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decadenza legale tentativo nel diritto penale termine di controllo divieto dell'abuso di diritto diritti procedurali magistrato

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 2 Abs. 2 ZGB

The court invoked the general prohibition of abuse of rights to justify ordering a bar on examining custody release applications without a specific statutory basis.

Art. 10 Abs. 2 BV

This provision guaranteeing personal liberty was cited in the context of the rights being limited by the bar on applications.

Art. 31 Abs. 4 BV

This provision guaranteeing the right to challenge detention was cited in the context of the rights being limited by the bar on applications.

Art. 5 Ziff. 4 EMRK

This provision guaranteeing the right to have the lawfulness of detention reviewed was cited in the context of the rights being limited by the bar on applications.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 31.08.2006

Fallnummer: · 21 06 118

LGVE: · 2006 I Nr. 61

Leitsatz: · Art. 10 Abs. 2 und 31 Abs. 4 BV; Art. 5 Ziff. 4 EMRK; Art. 2 Abs. 2 ZGB. Unabhängig von einer gesetzlichen Grundlage in der StPO kann der Haftrichter gestützt auf das allgemeine Rechtsmissbrauchsverbot gegen missbräuchliche Haftentlassungsgesuche eine Haftprüfungssperre anordnen. Dauer der Sperrfrist.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.