Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
21 04 224 • KG LU 21 04 224 Generato dall'IA

Prosecutor Violated Right to be Heard in Account Freeze Review Denial

Numero d'incarto 21 04 224
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court upheld a challenge against a prosecutor's decision that rejected a request to review a previously imposed account freeze, finding that the prosecutor violated the accused's right to be heard because the decision relied exclusively on unrecorded oral reports from the initial investigative authority and a written report that was only disclosed simultaneously with the final decision, thereby failing to meet the mandatory requirement for authorities to create records of procedural acts to enable the exercise of the right to inspect files.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV; §§ 66 und 261 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO. Das Akteneinsichtsrecht des Angeschuldigten setzt die Aktenführungspflicht der Behörde voraus. Stellt die Behörde bei ihrem Entscheid auf nicht protokollierte mündliche Amtsberichte oder auf erst mit dem Entscheid eröffnete Akten ab, so ist das rechtliche Gehör des Angeschuldigten verletzt. | Strafprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritti procedurali facoltà di astenersi dal testimoniare principio di opportunità sindacato giurisdizionale sequestro di mezzi di prova decisione incidentale impugnabile

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV
The constitutional guarantee of the right to be heard was violated because the Public Prosecutor relied on unrecorded oral reports and documents not previously served.
§ 261 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO
The violation of the right to be heard constituted a manifest violation of the law under this provision, justifying the action taken by the court.
§ 66 StPO
This provision, guaranteeing the right to inspect files, underpins the basis for the violation of the right to be heard.
Generato dall'IA
KA 01 132
Appeal Regarding Dismissal and Complainant's Right to Personal Hearing
JGKD 2002 1
Appeal Against Preliminary Deprivation of Legal Capacity Due to Procedural Flaws and Violation of Right to be Heard
21 97 161
Prosecutor's Refusal to Review Untimely Complaint Upheld
KA 02 154
Seizure Order Service and Appeal Period Commencement
2N 16 15
Prosecutor's Stay of Proceedings Appeal Admissibility Due to Defective Service Method

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV

The constitutional guarantee of the right to be heard was violated because the Public Prosecutor relied on unrecorded oral reports and documents not previously served.

§ 261 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO

The violation of the right to be heard constituted a manifest violation of the law under this provision, justifying the action taken by the court.

§ 66 StPO

This provision, guaranteeing the right to inspect files, underpins the basis for the violation of the right to be heard.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 03.12.2004

Fallnummer: · 21 04 224

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 59

Leitsatz: · Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV; §§ 66 und 261 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO. Das Akteneinsichtsrecht des Angeschuldigten setzt die Aktenführungspflicht der Behörde voraus. Stellt die Behörde bei ihrem Entscheid auf nicht protokollierte mündliche Amtsberichte oder auf erst mit dem Entscheid eröffnete Akten ab, so ist das rechtliche Gehör des Angeschuldigten verletzt.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.