Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1B 11 35 • KG LU 1B 11 35 Generato dall'IA

Venue for Enforcement Annulment Following Declaratory Judgment with Prorogated Forum

Numero d'incarto 1B 11 35
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court addressed a dispute where a party sought the annulment of an enforcement action connected to a negative declaratory judgment regarding professional fees. The court held that an application to set aside an enforcement action can be combined with a negative declaratory judgment action, and if the venue for the declaratory action was contractually agreed upon (prorogated), that same venue is competent for the enforcement annulment, notwithstanding mandatory enforcement venue rules. Furthermore, a forum selection clause contained within a mandate agreement, prepared by one party but signed only by the other, was deemed validly agreed upon under the applicable formal requirements, and challenging its validity on formal grounds was considered an abuse of rights, given that the party challenging it had actively relied on and benefited from the underlying mandate agreement.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

§ 93 ZPO LU (neu Art. 88 ZPO); Art. 22 Abs. 1 und 85a SchKG; Art. 9 aGestG (neu Art. 17 ZPO). Der Antrag auf Aufhebung einer Betreibung kann mit der negativen Feststellungsklage verbunden werden. Wurde der Gerichtsstand für die Feststellungsklage prorogiert, ist das prorogierte Gericht auch für die Aufhebung der Betreibung zuständig. Eine in einer Anwaltsvollmacht enthaltene Gerichtsstandsklausel ist gültig, auch wenn die Vollmacht nur von der Vollmachtgeberin unterzeichnet wurde. | Zivilprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ricorso per annullamento nel diritto dell'Unione azione di accertamento decisione d'esecuzione motivi di competenza regolamento interno decisione quadro

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 88 ZPO
Leitsatz: · § 93 ZPO LU (neu Art. 88 ZPO); Art.
Art. 9 aGestG
1 und 85a SchKG; Art. 9 aGestG (neu Art.
Art. 17 ZPO
9 aGestG (neu Art. 17 ZPO).
Art. 22 Abs. 1 SchKG
This provision is cited in the introductory summary/ruling section, relating to the substance of the debt enforcement matter being addressed.
Art. 22 SchKG
Art. 85a SchKG
This provision is cited in the introductory summary/ruling section, relating to the substantive issue of connecting the debt cancellation request with the declaratory action.
Art. 9 Abs. 1 ZPO
1 und 85a SchKG; Art. 9 aGestG (neu Art.
Art. 8a Abs. 3 lit. a SchKG

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 120 II 20
Representative v. Creditor: Negative Declaratory Action Regarding Improper Debt Enforcement
BGE 125 III 149
Article 85a DEBA Declaratory Action Admissibility After Formal Objection
BGE 128 III 334
Debtor's Remedy Against Unpursued Debt Collection Opposition
Generato dall'IA
11 03 69
Summary Procedure vs. Enforcement Under Lugano Convention Regarding Choice of Forum Clauses
11 97 106 260
Forum Selection Clause Validity in Architectural Contracts: Jurisdiction vs. Merits
OG 1996 33
Enforcement Proceedings Substantiation Requirements
3C 15 4
Jurisdictional Challenge and Procedural Violation in Provisional Measures During Foreign Divorce Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93 ZPO LU (neu Art. 88 ZPO)

This provision is cited in the introductory summary/ruling section, indicating its relevance to the overall decision framework regarding procedure or jurisdiction.

Art. 22 Abs. 1 SchKG

This provision is cited in the introductory summary/ruling section, relating to the substance of the debt enforcement matter being addressed.

Art. 85a SchKG

This provision is cited in the introductory summary/ruling section, relating to the substantive issue of connecting the debt cancellation request with the declaratory action.

Art. 9 aGestG (neu Art. 17 ZPO)

This provision is cited in the introductory summary/ruling section, pertaining to the validity of the forum selection clause.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · 1. Abteilung

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 30.01.2012

Fallnummer: · 1B 11 35

LGVE: · 2012 I Nr. 49

Leitsatz: · § 93 ZPO LU (neu Art. 88 ZPO); Art. 22 Abs. 1 und 85a SchKG; Art. 9 aGestG (neu Art. 17 ZPO). Der Antrag auf Aufhebung einer Betreibung kann mit der negativen Feststellungsklage verbunden werden. Wurde der Gerichtsstand für die Feststellungsklage prorogiert, ist das prorogierte Gericht auch für die Aufhebung der Betreibung zuständig. Eine in einer Anwaltsvollmacht enthaltene Gerichtsstandsklausel ist gültig, auch wenn die Vollmacht nur von der Vollmachtgeberin unterzeichnet wurde.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.

Das Bundesgericht hat die dagegen erhobene Beschwerde in Zivilsachen am 25. April 2012 abgewiesen [4A_140/2012].