Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
11 10 55 • KG LU 11 10 55 Generato dall'IA

Boathouse Addition Ownership Dispute

Numero d'incarto 11 10 55
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerned the ownership of an addition to a boathouse originally built in 1932 by the defendant's predecessor on the plaintiff's boathouse, following a limited-term agreement that was later terminated. The court affirmed the lower court's decision, reasoning that the plaintiff, as the established owner of the original boathouse, was inherently the owner of the addition under the mandatory provisions of Article 642 of the Civil Code, which dictates that an addition inseparable from the main structure becomes its component part, overriding any contractual stipulations between the parties regarding separate ownership of that component.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 642 ZGB, Art. 642 Abs. 1 ZGB, Art. 642 Abs. 2 ZGB, Art. 19 Abs. 2 OR; Boathouse Addition Ownership Dispute: The court affirmed the lower court's decision, reasoning that the plaintiff, as the established owner of the original boathouse, was inherently the owner of the addition under the mandatory provisions of Article 642 of the Civil Code, which dictates that an addition inseparable from the main structure becomes its component part, overriding any contractual stipulations between the parties regarding separate ownership of that component.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
causa civile comproprietà responsabilità per danni da acqua legge d'applicazione immediata proprietà mobiliare reintegrazione negli acquisti

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 642 ZGB
This provision was the basis for determining that the plaintiff was the owner of the boathouse extension because it qualified as a component part.
Art. 642 Abs. 1 ZGB
9 Leitsatz: · Art. 642 ZGB.
Art. 642 Abs. 2 ZGB
9 Leitsatz: · Art. 642 ZGB.
Art. 19 Abs. 2 OR
Generato dall'IA
11 06 129
Servitude Deletion and Obsolete Usefulness of Boat House Right
RRE Nr 1462
Lakeside Owners v. Administrative Body (Public Water Use Permit Denial)
1B 14 53
Co-Owners' Access Dispute to Neighboring Roof Terrace Over Water Damage Repair
7H 19 266
Insurance Denial Appeal Affirmed: Boathouse Damage Not Proven Storm Surge Cause

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 642 ZGB

This provision was the basis for determining that the plaintiff was the owner of the boathouse extension because it qualified as a component part.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Sachenrecht Entscheiddatum: · 28.10.2010 Fallnummer: · 11 10 55 LGVE: · 2011 I Nr. 9 Leitsatz: · Art. 642 ZGB. Eigentumsverhältnisse an einem Bootshaus und dessen Anbau. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.