Easement Holder's Right to General Prohibition Against Unauthorized Parking on Mutual Right-of-Way

The court upheld the issuance of a general prohibition concerning a mutual right-of-way over a shared street, affirming that the applicant, as a legitimate easement holder for the entire street, has the right to request such an order to secure his use of the right-of-way against unknown third parties parking on the road, regardless of the reciprocal nature of the servitude or the lack of prior objection to the parking by the other property owners. The court reasoned that a general prohibition under the relevant procedural code requires proof of the applicant's vested right and a credible interest justifying protection, which was met here by demonstrating that unauthorized parking by unspecified individuals interfered with the unimpeded use of the entire right-of-way, and further clarified that such a prohibition is only enforceable against unknown third parties, not the burdened property owners or their tenants, whose conduct must be addressed through different legal means.