Plaintiff's Subsequent Submission on Amount in Dispute Admitted
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe court held that a subsequent submission by the plaintiff regarding the amount in dispute must be admitted, as the determination of the cost allocation is an inherent part of the judgment and not subject to the principle of party disposition. The court reasoned that a judge is obliged to correct an apparently incorrectly stated value in dispute ex officio under the relevant procedural provisions.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 252 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 207 lit. a ZPO, § 21 Abs. 2 ZPO; Plaintiff's Subsequent Submission on Amount in Dispute Admitted: The court reasoned that a judge is obliged to correct an apparently incorrectly stated value in dispute ex officio under the relevant procedural provisions.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IABasis for allowing the subsequent submission regarding the value of the dispute.
Cited alongside § 252 Abs. 1 ZPO for the court's authority to correct the value in dispute.
Cited alongside § 252 Abs. 1 ZPO for the court's authority to correct the value in dispute.
Testo completo
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht Entscheiddatum: · 03.06.2009 Fallnummer: · 11 08 143.2 LGVE: · 2009 I Nr. 38 Leitsatz: · § 252 Abs. 1 ZPO. Zulassung einer nachträglichen Eingabe zur Streitwerthöhe. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.