Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
11 07 110 • KG LU 11 07 110 Generato dall'IA

Lessee Appeal Denied: Lessor's Intent to Self-Farm Justified Farm Lease Termination

Numero d'incarto 11 07 110
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A lessee sought an extension of a farm lease for a small parcel of land after the lessor acquired the entire property and terminated the lease, asserting the lessor's intent to self-farm the leased area. The court dismissed the lessee's appeal, reasoning that under the relevant law, termination is justified if the lessor demonstrates a genuine, practically possible intent to self-cultivate the land; the lessor's established status as a self-farmer of the larger property and his explicit statement of intent, supported by the context of the acquisition, sufficiently established this necessary will, meaning no material law was violated by denying the extension.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 27 Abs. 2 lit. c LPG. Unzumutbarkeit der Pachtfortsetzung, wenn der Verpächter den Pachtgegenstand selber bewirtschaften will. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
locatore di affitto protrazione della locazione diritto fondiario utilizzazione agricola motivazione diritti del locatore

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 27 Abs. 2 lit. c LPG
This article was the main ground for rejecting the claim for extension of the lease, as the landlord proved his intention to cultivate the leased land himself.
Art. 47 Abs. 2 BGBB
Art. 8 ZGB
Art. 27 LPG
Leitsatz: · Art. 27 Abs.
Art. 9 Abs. 1 BGBB
Art. 9 BGBB
§ 266 lit. a ZPO
This procedural rule defined the basis for the appeal regarding the alleged violation of substantive law.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision governs the imposition of costs, which were applied in the dispositive.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 94 II 258
Generato dall'IA
OG 1994 10
Agricultural Lease Extension and Mandatory Self-Cultivation Exclusion
A 01 230
Owner's Appeal for Land Valuation Revision Denied Based on Subjective Intent to Cease Farming
11 08 56
Lessor v. Lessee: Forest Management Rights Under Agricultural Lease
V 09 56
Appeal Dismissed Due to Expired Rights of First Refusal/Contractual Purchase Claim Against Farm Sale Approval
11 05 105
Landlord Eviction Dismissed Due to Unproven Agricultural Lease Breach

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 27 Abs. 2 lit. c LPG

This article was the main ground for rejecting the claim for extension of the lease, as the landlord proved his intention to cultivate the leased land himself.

§ 266 lit. a ZPO

This procedural rule defined the basis for the appeal regarding the alleged violation of substantive law.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the imposition of costs, which were applied in the dispositive.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 30.10.2007

Fallnummer: · 11 07 110

LGVE:

Leitsatz: · Art. 27 Abs. 2 lit. c LPG. Unzumutbarkeit der Pachtfortsetzung, wenn der Verpächter den Pachtgegenstand selber bewirtschaften will.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.