Appellants' Untimely Request for Remand Deemed Inadmissible

The appellate court reviewed a case where the appellants, having partially succeeded at the lower court, sought full affirmation of their claim in the appeal but later introduced a new request in their appeal brief seeking remand to the lower court for a new evidentiary hearing and reassessment. The court ruled that under the relevant procedural law, all substantive requests must be presented in the notice of appeal; procedural requests, such as requesting a remand for further proceedings, constitute substantive requests regarding the final disposition and must therefore be included in the initial declaration of appeal. Consequently, the belated request for remand was deemed inadmissible due to untimeliness, limiting the appellate review only to the original substantive claim for the full amount sought in the initial appeal declaration.