Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
11 03 69 • KG LU 11 03 69 Generato dall'IA

Summary Procedure vs. Enforcement Under Lugano Convention Regarding Choice of Forum Clauses

Numero d'incarto 11 03 69
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court addressed whether the summary procedure under local civil procedure code is considered an enforcement proceeding under Article 16(5) of the Lugano Convention, which would invalidate a contractual choice of forum clause. The court reasoned that the summary procedure serves to quickly establish a title for a claim (a title-production proceeding) rather than enforce an existing judgment, as required by the literal wording and the purpose of Article 16(5) of the Lugano Convention, which mandates restrictive interpretation for exclusive jurisdiction provisions. Consequently, since no mandatory jurisdiction under Article 16(5) applied, the parties' contractual agreement designating a specific forum was to be upheld, leading to the reversal of the lower court's decision that dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 16 Ziff. 5 LugÜ. Das Befehlsverfahren gemäss § 226 ZPO ist kein Zwangsvollstreckungsverfahren im Sinne von Art. 16 Ziff. 5 LugÜ. Da somit kein zwingender Gerichtsstand im Sinne dieser Bestimmung gegeben ist, sind allfällige Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen zu beachten. | Zivilprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
convenzione di Lugano codice di diritto processuale civile incompetenza per materia decisione d'esecuzione scelta della procedura interpretazione della sentenza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 16 Ziff. 5 Lug
Leitsatz: · Art. 16 Ziff. 5 LugÜ.
Art. 292 StGB
Art. 17 Lug
Art. 17 Abs. 3 Lug
Art. 16 Lug
Leitsatz: · Art. 16 Ziff.
Art. 20 GestG
Art. 16 EuGV
Leitsatz: · Art. 16 Ziff.
Art. 17 Abs. 1 Lug

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 103 II 251
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 16 Ziff. 5 LugÜ

The court implicitly ruled that this provision does not establish mandatory jurisdiction for the payment order procedure, allowing the contractual forum clause to stand.

Art. 17 Abs. 1 LugÜ

The court confirmed that the conditions for the validity of the forum selection clause under this article were met.

Art. 17 Abs. 3 LugÜ

The court confirmed that this provision excluding forum selection clauses in cases of mandatory jurisdiction under Art. 16 LugÜ did not apply, because Art. 16 Ziff. 5 LugÜ was inapplicable.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the dispositive concerning the allocation of court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 28.07.2003

Fallnummer: · 11 03 69

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 27

Leitsatz: · Art. 16 Ziff. 5 LugÜ. Das Befehlsverfahren gemäss § 226 ZPO ist kein Zwangsvollstreckungsverfahren im Sinne von Art. 16 Ziff. 5 LugÜ. Da somit kein zwingender Gerichtsstand im Sinne dieser Bestimmung gegeben ist, sind allfällige Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen zu beachten.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.