Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
11 02 70 • KG LU 11 02 70 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Court Refuses Inadmissible Post-Pleading Submissions Due to Procedural Bars

Numero d'incarto 11 02 70
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In an appeal concerning an employment dispute where parties submitted unauthorized documents after the pleadings concluded, the court ruled such submissions inadmissible because cantonal procedural law, including prohibitions on new evidence (Novensverbot) in the appellate stage, restricts the principle of inquiry (Untersuchungsgrundsatz) applicable in labor law matters. The court reasoned that the principle of inquiry under federal law does not relieve the appellant of the procedural duty to specifically articulate the points and reasons for challenging the contested judgment, meaning the appellate court is not obligated to supplement a deficient statement of grounds ex officio.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

§§ 216 und 249 ZPO; Art. 343 Abs. 4 OR. Der in arbeitsrechtlichen Streitigkeiten geltende Untersuchungsgrundsatz entbindet die appellierende Partei nicht von ihrer prozessualen Verpflichtung, das ergriffene Rechtsmittel zu begründen, d.h. im Einzelnen darzulegen, in welchen Punkten und aus welchen Gründen sie das angefochtene Urteil beanstandet. Der Untersuchungsgrundsatz gemäss Art. 343 Abs. 4 OR kann im Rechtsmittelverfahren durch kantonales Prozessrecht, insbesondere durch ein Novenverbot eingeschränkt werden. | Zivilprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
oggetto della lite dovere procedurale eccezioni processuali tardive impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio divieto di lavoro motivazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 343 Abs. 4 OR
This provision is cited in the context of the investigation principle in labor law disputes, which does not exempt the appealing party from the duty to substantiate the appeal.
Art. 343 OR
Leitsatz: · §§ 216 und 249 ZPO; Art. 343 Abs.
§§ 216 und 249 ZPO
These provisions are cited in relation to the inadmissibility of further submissions and the scope of the investigation principle in appellate proceedings.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 107 II 237
BGE 100 Ia 119
Deputy Agent v. General Agent (Contractual Party Dispute)
Generato dall'IA
OG 1995 39
Inadmissibility of Late Evidentiary Submissions in Appeals
11 97 21 245
Appellant v. Respondent Regarding Duty to Advise on Witness Testimony Objections
11 97 23 242
Appeal on Procedural Prohibition of New Evidence in Nullity Proceedings
V 97 265
Construction Objection Untimely Filed Appeal Affirmed
V 04 38
Procedural Requirements for Stating and Substantiating Administrative Appeals

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§§ 216 und 249 ZPO

These provisions are cited in relation to the inadmissibility of further submissions and the scope of the investigation principle in appellate proceedings.

Art. 343 Abs. 4 OR

This provision is cited in the context of the investigation principle in labor law disputes, which does not exempt the appealing party from the duty to substantiate the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 27.01.2003

Fallnummer: · 11 02 70

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 41

Leitsatz: · §§ 216 und 249 ZPO; Art. 343 Abs. 4 OR. Der in arbeitsrechtlichen Streitigkeiten geltende Untersuchungsgrundsatz entbindet die appellierende Partei nicht von ihrer prozessualen Verpflichtung, das ergriffene Rechtsmittel zu begründen, d.h. im Einzelnen darzulegen, in welchen Punkten und aus welchen Gründen sie das angefochtene Urteil beanstandet. Der Untersuchungsgrundsatz gemäss Art. 343 Abs. 4 OR kann im Rechtsmittelverfahren durch kantonales Prozessrecht, insbesondere durch ein Novenverbot eingeschränkt werden.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.