Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KSK 2022 13 • KG GR KSK 2022 13 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Wage Garnishment Order

Numero d'incarto KSK 2022 13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Grigioni (CH-GR)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali senza spese
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerned an appeal filed against a wage garnishment order issued on March 24, 2022, by the Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Office against the appellant, who was employed by a specific guesthouse. The appellant subsequently notified the Cantonal Court on April 9, 2022, that they were withdrawing their appeal, leading the court to dismiss the appeal as settled by withdrawal and decide that no costs would be levied for the appeal proceedings, adhering to regulations regarding appeal costs in such instances.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 20a Abs. 2 Ziff. 5 SchKG, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Wage Garnishment Order: The appellant subsequently notified the Cantonal Court on April 9, 2022, that they were withdrawing their appeal, leading the court to dismiss the appeal as settled by withdrawal and decide that no costs would be levied for the appeal proceedings, adhering to regulations regarding appeal costs in such instances.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pignoramento del salario ritiro della domanda di esecuzione procedura di fallimento spese di esecuzione costi salariali procedura direttrice Lohnsperre/Lohnpfändung | Aufsicht Beschwerde (SchKG 17 Abs. 1)

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 20a Abs. 2 Ziff. 5 SchKG
This provision was cited in the reasoning section to determine that the costs of the appeal proceedings remain with the Canton of Grisons.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF is the general provision governing court costs, which is applied when the court decides not to levy costs (Order 2).
Generato dall'IA
SKA 2008 12
Employer Appeal of Wage Garnishment Payment Order Dismissed
KSK 2012 59
Wage Garnishment Appeal Regarding Subsistence Minimum Calculation
KSK 2022 33
Appeal Against Wage Garnishment Calculation Excluding Child Support Payments
SKA 2008 1
Creditor Appeal Regarding Thirteenth Month Salary Garnishment
KSK 2011 39
Debtor Fails to Prove Subsistence Level Expenses in Garnishment Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 20a Abs. 2 Ziff. 5 SchKG

This provision was cited in the reasoning section to determine that the costs of the appeal proceedings remain with the Canton of Grisons.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF is the general provision governing court costs, which is applied when the court decides not to levy costs (Order 2).

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kantonsgericht von Graubünden Dretgira chantunala dal Grischun Tribunale cantonale dei Grigioni

Verfügung vom 11. April 2022

Referenz KSK 22 13

Instanz Schuldbetreibungsund Konkurskammer als Aufsichtsbehörde über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs

Besetzung Cavegn, Vorsitzender

Parteien A._____ Beschwerdeführerin

Gegenstand Lohnsperre/Lohnpfändung

Anfechtungsobj. Verfügung Betreibungsund Konkursamt der Region Maloja vom 24.03.2022

Mitteilung 12. April 2022 In Erwägung,

– dass in einer gegen A._____ geführten Betreibung des Betreibungsund Konkursamts der Region Engiadina Bassa/Val Müstair gegenüber dem Gasthaus B._____ als Arbeitgeber von A._____ durch das Betreibungsund Konkursamt der Region Maloja am 24. März 2022 eine Lohnsperre verfügt wurde;

– dass A._____ dagegen mit Eingabe vom 2. April 2022 Beschwerde an das Kantonsgericht von Graubünden erhob,

– dass das Betreibungsund Konkursamt der Region Maloja am 4. April 2022 zur Vernehmlassung aufgefordert wurde,

– dass A._____ mit Schreiben vom 9. April 2022 dem Kantonsgericht den Rückzug ihrer Beschwerde mitteilte,

– sodass die Beschwerde somit am Geschäftsverzeichnis abgeschrieben werden kann,

– dass die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens beim Kanton Graubünden verbleiben (Art. 20a Abs. 2 Ziff. 5 SchKG),

2/3 wird erkannt:

1. Die Beschwerde wird als durch Rückzug erledigt am Geschäftsverzeichnis abgeschrieben.

2. Es werden keine Kosten erhoben.

3. Mitteilung an:

3/3