Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/90/2019 • CJ GE ATAS/90/2019 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits Remission

Numero d'incarto ATAS/90/2019
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The applicant appealed a decision from the supplementary benefits service dated November 7, 2018, which rejected her request for remission, but at the hearing on February 7, 2019, the applicant, represented by her daughter, formally withdrew the appeal, leading the Social Insurance Chamber to acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the court roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits Remission: Vu la décision sur opposition rendue le 7 novembre 2018 par le Service des prestations complémentaires, rejetant la demande de remise formulée par Madame A______ ; Vu le recours interjeté par cette dernière en date du 7 décembre 2018 ; Vu la réponse de l’intimé du 10 janvier 2019; Vu l'audience du 7 février 2019, à laquelle la recourante a été représentée par sa fille ; Attendu qu'à l’issue de cette audience, la représentante de l’intéressée a indiqué retirer le recours ; Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca di prestazioni sociali prestazione complementare nuova domanda di prestazioni d'invalidità condono dell'imposta prestazione d'assicurazione sociale soppressione delle prestazioni assicurative

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision likely governs the legal basis for handling the costs associated with withdrawing a case, although it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the standard procedure in Swiss administrative law often implies cost allocation related to the procedural conclusion (withdrawal/striking off the roll). However, strictly adhering to the rule: since no article relating to costs or legal aid is explicitly cited in orders 1 and 2, no provision can be included based on the dispositive.
Generato dall'IA
A/2734/2016
Applicant's Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Decision
A/260/2019
Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Supplementary Benefits
A/2182/2017
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Decision
A/1049/2019
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision
A/3660/2013
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Reimbursement of Family Supplementary Benefits

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision likely governs the legal basis for handling the costs associated with withdrawing a case, although it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the standard procedure in Swiss administrative law often implies cost allocation related to the procedural conclusion (withdrawal/striking off the roll). However, strictly adhering to the rule: since no article relating to costs or legal aid is explicitly cited in orders 1 and 2, no provision can be included based on the dispositive.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/4311/2018 ATAS/90/2019

COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 7 février 2019 3ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame A______, domiciliée à, GENÈVE recourante

contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLÉMENTAIRES, DCS – SPC, sis route de Chêne 54, GENÈVE intimé

Siégeant : Karine STECK, Présidente ; Diane BROTO et Christine LUZZATTO , Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision sur opposition rendue le 7 novembre 2018 par le Service des prestations complémentaires, rejetant la demande de remise formulée par Madame A______ ; Vu le recours interjeté par cette dernière en date du 7 décembre 2018 ; Vu la réponse de l’intimé du 10 janvier 2019; Vu l'audience du 7 février 2019, à laquelle la recourante a été représentée par sa fille ; Attendu qu'à l’issue de cette audience, la représentante de l’intéressée a indiqué retirer le recours ; Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière La Présidente

Marie-Catherine SÉCHAUD Karine STECK

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/4311/2018