Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/90/2012 • CJ GE ATAS/90/2012 Generato dall'IA

Applicant Withdraws Appeal After Benefits Revision

Numero d'incarto ATAS/90/2012
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The applicant appealed a decision from the supplementary benefits service that had confirmed a prior ruling regarding benefits, but subsequently, the benefits service issued a revised decision addressing the applicant's initial objections. Following this revision, the applicant officially withdrew the appeal, leading the court to acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the register.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Applicant Withdraws Appeal After Benefits Revision: Following this revision, the applicant officially withdrew the appeal, leading the court to acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the register.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni complementari revisione della rendita invalidità revoca di prestazioni sociali ritiro della domanda di revisione legittimazione a ricorrere riesame di una decisione precedente

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive, this provision governs the procedure for costs in the Federal Supreme Court. Since the decision addresses the withdrawal of the appeal and the case is struck from the role, costs are typically addressed, however, in this specific dispositive, no cost provision is cited.
Generato dall'IA
A/4468/2006
Withdrawal of Revision Application Regarding Supplementary Benefits Appeal
A/1457/2022
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision
A/1776/2014
Claimant Withdraws Appeal of Supplementary Benefits Decision
A/2734/2016
Applicant's Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Decision
A/2607/2012
Withdrawal of Appeal After Favorable Reconsideration of Benefits Claim

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive, this provision governs the procedure for costs in the Federal Supreme Court. Since the decision addresses the withdrawal of the appeal and the case is struck from the role, costs are typically addressed, however, in this specific dispositive, no cost provision is cited.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

REPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENEVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/4417/2011 ATAS/90/2012

COUR DE JUSTICE

Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 8 février 2012

4ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame B__________, domiciliée au Lignon, représentée par le recourante Centre d'information et de réadaptation de l’Association pour le Bien des Aveugles et malvoyants

contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLEMENTAIRES, sis route intimé de Chêne 54, 1208 Genève

Siégeant : Juliana BALDE, Présidente; Rosa GAMBA et Olivier LEVY, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision sur opposition du 23 novembre 2011 du SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLEMENTAIRES (ci-après le SPC) confirmant sa décision du

22 août 2011 à l’encontre de Madame B__________ (ci-après l’assurée ou la recourante) ;

Vu le recours interjeté le 19 décembre 2011 par l’assurée, par l’intermédiaire de son mandataire, le Centre d’information et de réadaptation de l’Association pour le Bien des Aveugles et malvoyants ;

Vu le courrier du 5 janvier 2012 du SPC et son annexe, soit une nouvelle décision du 4 janvier 2012 adressée au mandataire de la recourante ;

Attendu que par courrier du 26 janvier 2012, le mandataire de la recourante indique que cette dernière retire son recours, dès lors que l’intimé a repris ses calculs et tenu compte des éléments auxquels l’assuré s’opposait ;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière La Présidente :

Isabelle CASTILLO Juliana BALDE

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/4417/2011