Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/888/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/888/2006 Generato dall'IA

Expert Testimony Admissibility in Product Liability Causation Dispute

Numero d'incarto ATAS/888/2006
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The dispute concerns a request for the admission of expert testimony regarding causation and damages in a product liability case, where the trial court initially excluded the expert's findings based on the insufficiency of the underlying scientific literature to support the opinions, leading to a subsequent grant of summary judgment for the defendant. The appellate court determined that the trial court's exclusion of the expert testimony was reversible error because the expert had adequately correlated the product's alleged defect with the resulting harm using sufficient scientific support, citing literature that supported the mechanism of injury, even if not perfectly identical to the facts of the case, thereby satisfying the required standard for admitting scientific testimony on causation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF, Art. 93 LTF; Expert Testimony Admissibility in Product Liability Causation Dispute: The appellate court determined that the trial court's exclusion of the expert testimony was reversible error because the expert had adequately correlated the product's alleged defect with the resulting harm using sufficient scientific support, citing literature that supported the mechanism of injury, even if not perfectly identical to the facts of the case, thereby satisfying the required standard for admitting scientific testimony on causation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
responsabilità per danno da prodotti perizia giudiziaria prova del nesso causale indennità del perito esclusione dei nova causalità dell'infortunio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited in the dispositive for ordering the appellant to pay the court fees.
Art. 64 LTF
Cited in the dispositive concerning the allocation of costs (legal aid).
Art. 93 LTF
Cited in the dispositive to declare the appeal inadmissible.
Generato dall'IA
A/182/2006
Product Liability Expert Testimony Exclusion Reversed
A/1940/2007
Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Evidentiary Review
A/1871/2006
Expert Testimony Admissibility Challenge
A/4209/2005
Subsequent Remedial Measures and Expert Testimony Admissibility
A/212/2007
Expert Testimony Admissibility in Structural Failure Case

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the dispositive for ordering the appellant to pay the court fees.

Art. 64 LTF

Cited in the dispositive concerning the allocation of costs (legal aid).

Art. 93 LTF

Cited in the dispositive to declare the appeal inadmissible.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo



               "#$%"&''( )""&''(

)

 )+ +)+  +   

,- .

 $$ /0/ &''( 

 !"#$%&%& '  ( "#"

"#  !"#$)* +%&,%  !#-./$.""#0$."" 1.   .



.

22  '   2 2  (   "$?" 3 22  !"2.'456   

  222 3    22  &    !-.78&9!7:;4<= >



           !

  &),  

+ 1)

%* @A#."&4@/&::4!9B#C#D" D"-#B.  -$  "/ " "#  ! $   %97:! .   !$%954!E0$..#$"."&,-.#D%999*

&* 2C??,"@A#.! D"-#B."$.F -."E0-.A.-#.$-.."."0... "-$/G"0$-F*

;* @A#.""/."/"$?.?;#&::4.$.$.#"0??  D"$%,#&::4*

,*  $."/.A." D"$E"#""-"0 -.. " . #$ -".  #A " ,;04;; ?* %8 -B "  22   '   2    (   3 22   H  I!"&7@&::4"'*

8* &4@.&::4! D"$?#$$-FE!! --." 6 0... " -$/G -? " "#" " .?$  ## " &%07%4 ?* 4:   #-. " D -A "  "#"*  $-F   . - "$.#$   ! "  "$ #-.%%-.#D&::4*

4*  %% J. &::4!  "#"  ##E$  D " $  "$"#-."D-A-B"   222 *

5* 2!$.$.6@A*

+ )

%* 0.*&8"?$"$D-A"-$/G-?! /!//../".$"%5"$#D%99;H3I!.$/A %@/&:::!BA-$"""/*E@.. -"K"-..".6-.AH.*%&&.%&; " /' I! @A"""/#-$.."0.*5;*%"?$"$ -$/G -? " &8 @ %97& HI! . 6 B/  D .""-%J.&::;!".!-BE0??  $.$.#H.*%,& I!F$."0??-.AD" $" $-.."$.#$-@A""/*

    )9%,)&::4 ;),  

&* 20.*&&3H/./A"-%@/&:::I! " "/!  -.. " . E ".  #A . -.A$ ?#$#. F.*%&&!%&;!%,%.%,& +.*;68 30--E. -A#..6.?$H*%I*CE@.!-.." .6-.A-"6"??$.-..".!A#.$ " / " D -A F.. $/.#.  ##. " "/! .  -..".!A#.$"/"D-AF..$/.#. ##.""#AH?*.*&,3I*!@. 6  -.. " . . 6 0/ " D -A F..  ##. "   " #A  .$L. "  ##. " "/ H 3 %&7  &;:+ 3%&9,,,I*

K-B!@A"-#B."$.FF'$-F"-.A- #.$ "  -.. " . /.  "#" "  ... " -$/G*  ". -.. .! "K -.!  " #A!  &, -.#D %999! . "K. -.  ; # &::4! ". 6 E  @A#. " "/."/F$.*

;* 2A#.!-..E-".#A- "#" . " ,;04;; ?* %8 -B "   !  .$L. G. "$@6 $.$ $-'* "#"".6F'$-#.."&%07%4 ?*4:*

,* ?#$#. 6  @-"! "-  @ "$.#. -  -.A @E0##.".?."-..".""#!@. "/$D$$?"..-..".6".$L.#-. #.."'* .$L..$.F###$A0.*%& "0"-$/G-?/!//../".$ " %7 / %97, H &I    .F $A#.!  ' . -$ H 3-D$;4):&"%7@.&::;I

8*  $##.   -M!  -$" $.. A.. H.* 5; * &  . 79>*%"-$""#../"%&-.#D%978I*



NNN



    )9%,)&::4 ,),  

  )1  )+ +)+  +   



20/3/-- 4  5// /  6! $(& 7

%* /.  22   '   2 2    (   3 22  6.?$!"#-." ! 2 O 4;%*54*,%,*&8;!  ## " &%07%4 ?* 4:     222 ! 3       22   &B#  ! O   ,759 . #-. O 9,::848'97'%:!  ?/ " "#   !  E  .$L. #-.""$.!"B;#&::4@E0##." .?.*

&* KG"#..E"D*

;* .E-$".A..*

,* ?#  -. "  E0 -/. ?#  .  -$. L. "  "$ " ;: @ "B  .?. - - ##"$ "$  D ?$"$ " ! 2CPQC?E 4! 4::,   !  . F#-*  "$  -. L. -A$*  #$# ". R I "E F.#. E "$  . "$ D.   . - "  "$..E$+DIF--E#.?.#-/"#".. ."$+I-.A."-$..*2#$#  .. -  . $$#. $#$$  .. I DI . I '"!  D?$"$"--.#.BE0 "/"$/D*#$#"#.#G " -/! E . @.!  E  "$ ..E$ . 0/-- " E$.$F-$"$.H.*%;&!%:4.%:7I*  A??B  $".R           (S < G    -?#"-$.L...?$F-.EK6K???$"$ "-A??

    )9%,)&::4