Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/849/2009 • CJ GE ATAS/849/2009 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Disability Insurance Benefits

Numero d'incarto ATAS/849/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali senza spese

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The matter involved an appeal filed by an individual challenging a decision from the Cantonal Disability Insurance Office dated February 10, 2009, which had refused the granting of disability insurance benefits. Following the filing of the appeal and subsequent procedural steps, the court noted that at the hearing on the day of the decision, the appellant formally withdrew the recourse. Consequently, the Cantonal Social Insurance Tribunal accepted the withdrawal, canceled the case from its roll, and waived the collection of any fees.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Disability Insurance Benefits: Following the filing of the appeal and subsequent procedural steps, the court noted that at the hearing on the day of the decision, the appellant formally withdrew the recourse. Consequently, the Cantonal Social Insurance Tribunal accepted the withdrawal, canceled the case from its roll, and waived the collection of any fees.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
soppressione della prestazione d'assicurazione prestazione dell'assicurazione invalidità procedura di assicurazioni sociali ripristino della rendita di invalidità soppressione della rendita d'invalidità revoca del gratuito patrocinio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision, implicitly referenced by the decision not to charge fees despite the withdrawal, would typically govern court fees, but since the dispositive explicitly only waives the fee, no specific cost article is strictly cited for that action. However, if we strictly adhere to citing articles *explicitly* mentioned in the dispositive, and no such article is present for orders 1, 2, or 3, the output should be empty. In this specific case, orders 1, 2, and 3 do not explicitly cite any legal articles.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

REPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENEVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/802/2009 ATAS/849/2009

ARRET

DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Chambre 4 du 24 juin 2009

En la cause

Madame B_________, domiciliée à Genève, comparant avec recourante élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître Nils DE DARDEL

contre

OFFICE CANTONAL DE L'ASSURANCE-INVALIDITE, sis rue intimé de Lyon 97, Genève

Siégeant : Juliana BALDE, Présidente; Christine LUZZATTO et Monique STOLLER FÜLLEMANN, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision de l'Office cantonal de l'assurance-invalidité (ci-après OCAI) du 10 février 2009 refusant l’octroi de prestations de l’assurance-invalidité à Madame B__________;

Vu le recours interjeté le 9 mars 2009 par l’intéressée, par l’intermédiaire de son conseil Me Nils DE DARDEL, avocat ;

Vu le complément au recours du 8 avril 2009 ;

Vu la réponse de l’OCAI du 15 mai 2009 ;

Vu l’audience de comparution personnelle des parties de ce jour au cours de laquelle la recourante a déclaré retirer son recours ;

PAR CES MOTIFS, LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Renonce à percevoir un émolument.

3. Raye la cause du rôle.

La Présidente :

La greffière :

Juliana BALDE Isabelle CASTILLO

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/802/2009